2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.18.953802
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the number of synapses in the hippocampus and brain-wide by volume electron microscopy and genetic labeling

Abstract: 34We have estimated the densities of synapses per unit volume in the whole mouse brain. To do 35 this, we combined Spinning Disc confocal Microscopy (SDM) that acquires images of synaptic 36 proteins labeled with fluorophores in large brain areas, and FIB-SEM, a three-dimensional 37 electron microscopy technique that provides a resolution beyond that of the confocal 38 microscope, but in relatively small areas. The postsynaptic scaffold proteins PSD95 and SAP102 39were genetically labeled to visualize excitato… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the density of inhibitory synapses was particularly low in most CA1 layers (AS:SS ratio in all layers was around 95:5 except for in SLM, where the ratio was close to 90:10). This data is in line with our study using FIB/SEM to analyze the synaptic density in the mouse (where the proportion of synapses that were inhibitory was 8% in the SLM, and approximately 2% in the case of the SR and SO) (22) and in the rat CA1 field (where 4% of the synapses in SR were inhibitory; Blazquez-Llorca et al, in preparation).…”
Section: Spatial Synaptic Distribution Proportion Of Synapses and Posupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, the density of inhibitory synapses was particularly low in most CA1 layers (AS:SS ratio in all layers was around 95:5 except for in SLM, where the ratio was close to 90:10). This data is in line with our study using FIB/SEM to analyze the synaptic density in the mouse (where the proportion of synapses that were inhibitory was 8% in the SLM, and approximately 2% in the case of the SR and SO) (22) and in the rat CA1 field (where 4% of the synapses in SR were inhibitory; Blazquez-Llorca et al, in preparation).…”
Section: Spatial Synaptic Distribution Proportion Of Synapses and Posupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These values are much higher than the ones found in the present work for the human CA1 (Table 1). Such huge differences in synaptic density between humans and rodents -together with the above-mentioned divergences in the morphology and distribution of pyramidal cells in the SP of CA1 (18), as well as differences in other anatomical, genetic, molecular and physiological features (18,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)-further support the notion that there are remarkable differences between the human and rodent CA1. These differences clearly need to be taken into consideration when making interpretations in translational studies comparing one species to another.…”
Section: Synaptic Densitymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we found that the AS:SS ratio was 96.25:3.75. Preliminary results from our laboratory, using the FIB/SEM methodology, have shown that the AS:SS ratios are 98:2 and 96:4 in the stratum radiatum of the mouse and human CA1, respectively 29,30 . That is, the ratio of AS and SS in the CA1 field is similar in humans and rodents.…”
Section: Ratio Of As and Ssmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We found a synaptic density of 2.52 synapses / µm 3 . Using FIB/SEM, we have previously shown that the synaptic density in the stratum radiatum of CA1 of the mouse is 2.36 synapses / µm 3 (29) , whereas in the stratum radiatum of CA1 of the human hippocampus, it is 0.67 synapses / µm 3 (30) . Thus, the synaptic density of the rat and mouse is remarkably similar but there are huge differences in synaptic density between humans and rodents.…”
Section: Synaptic Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%