1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-2040(99)00043-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the lateral dimensions of cellulose crystallites using NMR signal strengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

21
180
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
21
180
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, with increasing crystallinity, tensile strength, dimensional stability, and density increase, while properties such as chemical reactivity and swelling decrease. Some of the frequently used techniques for estimating cellulose crystallinity are wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) (Segal et al 1959;Jayme and Knolle 1964;Leppänen et al 2009), solid state 13 C cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Horii et al 1987;Newman and Hemmingson 1990;Newman 1999), and Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Richter et al 1991;Hulleman et al 1994). Although WAXS is the most extensively used technique, the X-ray method involves isolation of amorphous background from the diffraction pattern, which in the case of cellulose crystallites is not always easy for reasons that have to do with cellulose crystallites being small and, at lower crystallinities, the diffraction pattern being poorly defined (weak broad features).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, with increasing crystallinity, tensile strength, dimensional stability, and density increase, while properties such as chemical reactivity and swelling decrease. Some of the frequently used techniques for estimating cellulose crystallinity are wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) (Segal et al 1959;Jayme and Knolle 1964;Leppänen et al 2009), solid state 13 C cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Horii et al 1987;Newman and Hemmingson 1990;Newman 1999), and Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Richter et al 1991;Hulleman et al 1994). Although WAXS is the most extensively used technique, the X-ray method involves isolation of amorphous background from the diffraction pattern, which in the case of cellulose crystallites is not always easy for reasons that have to do with cellulose crystallites being small and, at lower crystallinities, the diffraction pattern being poorly defined (weak broad features).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if in addition to cellulose the sample includes hemicellulose and lignin (e.g., in wood) the 13 C solid state NMR spectra contain overlapping peaks, and in such cases the crystallinity calculation is based upon first separating the total NMR signal into two components, one belonging to cellulose and the other to the other non-cellulose contributors (Newman and Hemmingson 1990;Newman 1999). However, it was found that the accuracy of the NMR method depends not only upon how well the spectra can be separated into the contributions of cellulose and non-cellulose components but also upon the lateral dimensions of the crystallites (Newman 1999). Additionally, NMR crystallinity determination involves use of curvefitting methods that have shortcomings (Maddams 1980;Meier 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These details have been elusive. The determination of microfibril diameters in wood has been addressed frequently by a variety of techniques, particularly wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and solid-state 13 C NMR (19)(20)(21)(22). However each technique has drawbacks and agreement has not been generally good.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However each technique has drawbacks and agreement has not been generally good. Diameters suggested have ranged from 2.2 nm to 3.6 nm (20,23). These upper and lower limits correspond to about 12 and 32 chains (πr 2 ∕0.317) if it is assumed that the wood microfibrils are approximately circular in crosssection and each chain occupies 0.317 nm 2 as in cellulose Iβ (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation