1984
DOI: 10.1016/0143-7208(84)80027-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the Kubelka—Munk scattering coefficient from single particle scattering parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particular concerns include the fact that it does not work well for systems such as dyed paper and the interpretation of the physical meaning of the K‐M coefficients. The theory therefore continues to receive considerable attention in the form of modifications, and several more general approaches to the radiative transfer problem (based on four‐flux and multi‐flux models) have been developed 22–28. Moreover, the exponential rise of available computational resources in the past 40 years has also rekindled an interest in directly relating microstructural properties of individual or groups of particles to the optical behavior of coatings containing those particles.…”
Section: From Particle To Property and Back Again: A Literature Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular concerns include the fact that it does not work well for systems such as dyed paper and the interpretation of the physical meaning of the K‐M coefficients. The theory therefore continues to receive considerable attention in the form of modifications, and several more general approaches to the radiative transfer problem (based on four‐flux and multi‐flux models) have been developed 22–28. Moreover, the exponential rise of available computational resources in the past 40 years has also rekindled an interest in directly relating microstructural properties of individual or groups of particles to the optical behavior of coatings containing those particles.…”
Section: From Particle To Property and Back Again: A Literature Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yellowness and 0 degrees of the samples were evaluated by Hunter Lab Ultra Scan PRO (USA) [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Yellowness and Whiteness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility test microorganisms were determined after 24 h by measuring the axial (crude sample piece ax was about 13 mm) zone of inhibition around each sample pieces imbedded on the inoculated agar surface at 30 ⁰C to the nearest mm. [25,26] Colour measurements [22,23,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Measurements of the colour strength of the dyed fabrics (expressed as K/S) have been done using the Hunter Lab Ultra-Scan Pro, at the National Research Center, Egypt. K/S value of the fabrics were evaluated by reflectance technique according to the Kubalka-Munk equation [34] given below:…”
Section: Microbiological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bath was thermostatically adjusted to 95 o C. The test was run for 45 minutes at 42 rpm. The samples were then removed, rinsed twice in 100 ml bath of water at 40 o C for one minute with occasional stirring or hand squeezing, souring in 100 ml of 0.014% solution of acetic acid for one minute at 27 o C, rinsing again for one minute in 100 ml water at 27 o C followed by drying [28]. Evaluation of the wash fastness was established using the Gray Scale reference for colour change.…”
Section: Microbiological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%