2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2868-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the Gini coefficient for the lognormal distribution of income using the Lorenz curve

Abstract: The main objective of the study is to compare the Newton–Cotes methods such as the Trapezium rule, Simpson 1/3 rule and Simpson 3/8 rule to estimate the area under the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient of income using polynomial function with degree 5. Comparing the Gini coefficients of income computed from the Polynomial function with degree 5 for the Trapezium, Simpson 1/3 and Simpson 3/8 methods using the relative errors showed that the trapezium rule, Simpson’s 1/3 rule and Simpson’s 3/8 rule show negative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, from an extensive comparison of several different distributions proposed as models for empirical income data, such as including gamma and beta types of distributions and others [ 35 ], the lognormal distribution was found to surpass the usage of other distributions in many practical applications (see from page 126). More recently, statistical testing of 15 different income distributions in Ghana, Africa, showed no significant deviation from log-normal distributions [ 29 ], which agrees with the present results of curve fitting. Of note, the present approach to analyze the distributions of Gini indices can be transferred easily to the above-mentioned indices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, from an extensive comparison of several different distributions proposed as models for empirical income data, such as including gamma and beta types of distributions and others [ 35 ], the lognormal distribution was found to surpass the usage of other distributions in many practical applications (see from page 126). More recently, statistical testing of 15 different income distributions in Ghana, Africa, showed no significant deviation from log-normal distributions [ 29 ], which agrees with the present results of curve fitting. Of note, the present approach to analyze the distributions of Gini indices can be transferred easily to the above-mentioned indices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A second focus of the present analysis was amending the ambiguity of the classical Gini index. Despite the fact that the Gini coefficient has been judged as one of the most efficient measurements of income inequality in the world [ 29 ], it is known to suffer from several shortcomings. As a main weakness, its incapability of differentiating different kinds of inequalities has been highlighted [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using well-developed measures of disparity to evaluate its impact on AKI risk should be assessed in future investigations (e.g., the Gini coefficient commonly used measure of inequality to detect the income distribution of residents in each country). 44 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gini coefficient of inequality was computed for the lognormal distribution [73] of income. Using its shape parameter s (see below) the Gini coefficient was computed as G = erfc(−s/2) − 1; erfc is the complementary error function [74,75]. The probability density function of the lognormal distribution is defined for positive x from a location parameter m and a shape parameter s > 0:…”
Section: General Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%