1991
DOI: 10.1021/ie00050a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the adsorbent capacities from the adsorption isotherm of binary liquid mixtures on solids

Abstract: Methods available in the literature to estimate the adsorbent capacity from the adsorption isotherm of binary liquid mixtures generally assume that the adsorptives are identical, that the adsorbed phase is monolayer, and that the separation factor (or selectivity) of the system is constant. These assumptions limit the application and reliability of these methods. Based on the concept of the average molecular thickness of the adsorbed-phase layer, an alternative method is proposed that addresses the shortcoming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models are generally based on the principles of statistical thermodynamic which are used for estimating certain parameters such as the surface excess, the parachor, etc. [13,141 which have to be included. Most of these models can be used only for well-defined binary or ternary mixtures.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are generally based on the principles of statistical thermodynamic which are used for estimating certain parameters such as the surface excess, the parachor, etc. [13,141 which have to be included. Most of these models can be used only for well-defined binary or ternary mixtures.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for 1-naphthol at C, = 0.01 q, is 1.5 pmol/g, while at C, = 0.10 q, falls to 0.4 pmol/g. This phenomenon has been observed in other systems (Dada and Wenzel, 1991) and in one case was attributed to a decrease in the accessibility of the cellulose gel caused by the increase in the quantity of adsorbent per unit volume (Hedberg and Lindstorm, 1993).…”
Section: Adsorption Of Naphtholsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…where Γ is the molecular coverage of a rutile nanoparticle by Alizarin Red S, Γ* is as defined earlier, wt is the loading of dyemodified rutile drop-casted onto a gold electrode (= 0.29 mg cm -2 ), NA is Avogadro's number (= 6.022 × 10 23 mol -1 ), and m' is a monolayer capacity 92 which is the ratio of the BET surface area (= 6.5 m 2 g -1 ) over the molecular cross sectional area of Alizarin Red S (= 1.2 × 10 -18 m 2 per molecule, estimated using Chem 3D software). By solving the above equation, the molecular coverage of 0.15 (± 0.02) monolayers of the dye is found to be present at the rutile surface.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%