2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of synergetic effects of CO2 in high ash coal-char steam gasification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slopes of the relationships calculated for the VM and the RPM models are an almost parallel line which indicates that almost similar activation energy values are calculated from these models. The activation energy of the steam gasification is varying from 129 to 177 kJmol −1 using GM model, and around 110 kJmol −1 using RPM model, and the reaction rate constants from 4 × 10 3 to 3 × 10 6 min −1 which are similar to values obtained in previous studies [33,35,36,43,44,47,64,71] . It can be observed that the activation energy of VM model is always higher irrespective of the char generation method.…”
Section: Indian Coalssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slopes of the relationships calculated for the VM and the RPM models are an almost parallel line which indicates that almost similar activation energy values are calculated from these models. The activation energy of the steam gasification is varying from 129 to 177 kJmol −1 using GM model, and around 110 kJmol −1 using RPM model, and the reaction rate constants from 4 × 10 3 to 3 × 10 6 min −1 which are similar to values obtained in previous studies [33,35,36,43,44,47,64,71] . It can be observed that the activation energy of VM model is always higher irrespective of the char generation method.…”
Section: Indian Coalssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Investigations concerning the reactions of H 2 O and CO 2 with high ash chars during gasification are quite limited. According to reported results [29,43,47,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64], possiblility of two surface reaction mechanisms to be emerged. First approach claims that C─H 2 O and C─CO 2 reactions takes place in common active sites, whereas the another approach asserts that the reaction of CO 2 and steam happen in separate active sites.…”
Section: Figure 13amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation energies in this study (around 162 and 66 kJ/mol) are different from each other for the same kind of chars, which may be caused by the different ash contents in chars. Also, Jayaraman and his colleagues' study about estimation of synergetic effects of steam gasification for a similar type of Turkish coal [26]. In a different study about steam gasification of Victorian brown coal chars, activation energies are very similar to Zonguldak char while the compositions of the chars are very similar [27].…”
Section: Figure 6 Rate Expression With Arrhenius Plotsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many researchers [21][22][23][24] have devised reaction models of char-carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and char-water vapor (H 2 O) separately to explore the coal gasification reaction mechanism. The kinetics of both char-CO 2 and char-H 2 O gasification have also been studied in detail [25][26][27][28]. However, these studies, carried out in systems with a sole gasifying agent, could hardly be applied in systems where the mixtures of carbon dioxide, water vapor, carbon monoxide (CO), and hydrogen (H 2 ) usually serve as gasifying agents in actual industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%