2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-009-9630-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of stochastic nonlinear dynamic response of rock-fill dams with uncertain material parameters for non-stationary random seismic excitation

Abstract: This research investigates the effect of uncertain material parameters on the stochastic, dynamic response of a rock-fill dam-foundation system subjected to non-stationary random excitation. The uncertain material parameter of particular interest is the shear modulus, developed from a lognormal distribution model. The stochastic seismic response model of the dam-foundation system, with uncertain material parameters and subjected to random loads is the result of a Monte Carlo simulation method. The nonlinear be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, with the fast development of computer techniques, more and more scholars use finite difference software and finite element analysis software, such as FLAC3D and ANSYS, to solve dynamic problems. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Therefore, the main idea of this article is fourfold: (1) by considering the energy mechanism of the rockburst, a calculation model of common mining area would be presented to analyze the rockburst energy including elastic strain and dissipative energy; (2) using the split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing system, a series of SHPB tests would be carried out, to obtain the percentage of the fractured dissipative energy occupied in total input dynamic energy; (3) meanwhile, to fit the dynamic mechanical parameters of rock specimens and dynamic impact factors (DIF) also with SHPB testing data; and (4) to predict the contours of energy and the damage conditions of host rock and estimate the tendentiousness of the rockburst by employing the numerical simulation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with the fast development of computer techniques, more and more scholars use finite difference software and finite element analysis software, such as FLAC3D and ANSYS, to solve dynamic problems. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Therefore, the main idea of this article is fourfold: (1) by considering the energy mechanism of the rockburst, a calculation model of common mining area would be presented to analyze the rockburst energy including elastic strain and dissipative energy; (2) using the split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing system, a series of SHPB tests would be carried out, to obtain the percentage of the fractured dissipative energy occupied in total input dynamic energy; (3) meanwhile, to fit the dynamic mechanical parameters of rock specimens and dynamic impact factors (DIF) also with SHPB testing data; and (4) to predict the contours of energy and the damage conditions of host rock and estimate the tendentiousness of the rockburst by employing the numerical simulation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nour et al [46] also carried out probabilistic seismic response analysis using Monte Carlo simulations with deterministic FEM solver -FLUSH [47]. Hacefendiolu et al [48] investigated the effect of lognormally distributed shear modulus on the dynamic response of a dam foundation system subjected to non-stationary random excitation, using the Monte Carlo method. For an elastic domain, the study was based on an equivalent linear method.…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification In Wave Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%