2011
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2011.1278.1282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Standardized Ileal Digestible Lysine Requirement of Starting Broiler Chicks Fed Soybean-and Cottonseed Meal-Based Diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 5, the estimated dLys, dMet, and dThr by the ANN model were higher than those reported using mono-objective optimization (Baker et al, 2002;Yaghobfar and Boldaji, 2002;Garcia et al, 2006;Zaboli et al, 2011;Mehri, 2012;Mehri et al, 2012), and they were close to the recommendations of Ross broiler nutrient specifications (de Lima et al, 2013). The results revealed that RSM models may underestimate the nutritional requirements of broilers and analyzing data with a soft-computing approach could resolve this problem using the desirability function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 5, the estimated dLys, dMet, and dThr by the ANN model were higher than those reported using mono-objective optimization (Baker et al, 2002;Yaghobfar and Boldaji, 2002;Garcia et al, 2006;Zaboli et al, 2011;Mehri, 2012;Mehri et al, 2012), and they were close to the recommendations of Ross broiler nutrient specifications (de Lima et al, 2013). The results revealed that RSM models may underestimate the nutritional requirements of broilers and analyzing data with a soft-computing approach could resolve this problem using the desirability function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Because the nutritional experiments involve more than one response, determination of optimum conditions on the independent variables requires simultaneous consideration of all the responses. However, the most studies report single evaluation of each response (e.g., BW gain or feed conversion ratio, FCR) in the optimization process at a time Baker, 1993, 1994a;Baker and Han, 1994;Baker et al, 2002;Mehri et al, 2010aMehri et al, ,b, 2012Zaboli et al, 2011;Ghazaghi et al, 2012;Mehri, 2012), and complex relationships among multiple responses have been overlooked. In addition, the bird responses are usually correlated functionally (e.g., FCR is a function of the feed consumed); therefore, analyzing performance data using a ABSTRACT The optimization algorithm of a model may have significant effects on the final optimal values of nutrient requirements in poultry enterprises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The continuous data need to be tted by regression models either with linear or quadratic patterns. Among different mathematical models, broken line models are the most prevalent models for determination of nutrient requirements in mammals and poultry [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . In general, the broken line models consisted of one or two slope sections and each section may follow the linear and/or quadratic manners in ascending and/or descending orders 6-8, 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EAA) under different conditions, the specific ratio of each nutrient to dietary AME may be considered as an efficient practice. Usually, experiments dealing with determination of AA requirements were based on single titration of a specific AA and obtaining breakpoint as ‘ requirement ’ point without taking into account complex relationships between AAs and other nutritional factors such as AME (Baker and Han, ; Han and Baker, ; Baker et al., ; Dozier et al., ; Mehri et al., ,b, ; Zaboli et al., ). It has been reported that the optimal ratios of lysine to AME (Lys: AME) might be needed for optimization of growth performance of broiler chickens in different phases of growth (Ajinomoto, ), where more lean carcass could be obtained with higher ratio of Lys: AME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%