1998
DOI: 10.1080/09593331908616678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Soil Trace Metal Bioavailability using Unbuffered Salt Solutions: Degree of Saturation of Polluted Soil Extracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Released Pb could be also considered relatively significant. However, the determination of Pb availability by means of mild extractants is known to be limited since the soil contamination by Pb is constituted by insoluble lead compounds in the form of hydroxides, carbonates, sulfates, and phosphates (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Released Pb could be also considered relatively significant. However, the determination of Pb availability by means of mild extractants is known to be limited since the soil contamination by Pb is constituted by insoluble lead compounds in the form of hydroxides, carbonates, sulfates, and phosphates (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available heavy metal concentrations were determined in 10 g of soil with 50 mL of CaCl 2 solution (0.01 M ) according to Lebourg et al (1996)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fraction of soil metal that can be taken up by plants (i.e., the bioavailable fraction) (Singh and Rakipov, 1988) is most often estimated with chemical extractions that are routinely used in soil testing (Lebourg et al, 1996). Many chemical extractants (CaCl 2 and other dilute salts, DTPA [diethylene triaminepentaacetic acid] and EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid]) have been used to identify the portion of metals in the soil that is the most readily available (Beckett, 1989; Lebourg et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fraction of soil metal that can be taken up by plants (i.e., the bioavailable fraction) (Singh and Rakipov, 1988) is most often estimated with chemical extractions that are routinely used in soil testing (Lebourg et al, 1996). Many chemical extractants (CaCl 2 and other dilute salts, DTPA [diethylene triaminepentaacetic acid] and EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid]) have been used to identify the portion of metals in the soil that is the most readily available (Beckett, 1989; Lebourg et al, 1996). Such chemical extractions can hardly account for the various, complex processes that are involved in the acquisition of metals by plants (Marschner, 1995; McLaughlin et al, 1998; Hinsinger, 2001), and are thus not satisfactory for estimating soil metal bioavailability to plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%