2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of small failure probabilities based on thermodynamic integration and parallel tempering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, considering alternative approaches for the intermediate steps in both phases could be interesting, such as incorporating a method based on smoothed indicator functions and thermodynamic integration proposed by Xiao et al. (2019), in the second phase. Finally, exploring test cases that do not rely on Gaussian assumptions would be intriguing, as previously undertaken for the posterior part in Amaya et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, considering alternative approaches for the intermediate steps in both phases could be interesting, such as incorporating a method based on smoothed indicator functions and thermodynamic integration proposed by Xiao et al. (2019), in the second phase. Finally, exploring test cases that do not rely on Gaussian assumptions would be intriguing, as previously undertaken for the posterior part in Amaya et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surrogates (e.g., Razavi et al, 2012) in this context can serve as simplified models or approximations of the underlying system, allowing for faster evaluations and reducing the computational burden. Moreover, considering alternative approaches for the intermediate steps in both phases could be interesting, such as incorporating a method based on smoothed indicator functions and thermodynamic integration proposed by Xiao et al (2019), in the second phase. Finally, exploring test cases that do not rely on Gaussian assumptions would be intriguing, as previously undertaken for the posterior part in Amaya et al (2021Amaya et al ( , 2022.…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct implementation of Bayesian principles for the original physical model is usually not feasible using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations [ 26 ] or even Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches [ 27 ]. Any advanced technique, such as thermodynamic integration [ 28 ], parallel tempering [ 29 ], nested sampling [ 30 , 31 ], subset simulation [ 32 , 33 ], or Gaussian mixture importance sampling [ 34 ] is still not feasible for applications where the original model is very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that such plain Monte Carlo techniques require a large number of model runs, and become computationally very demanding for many applied problems [6,9]. Thermodynamic integration [10], thermodynamic integration combined with parallel tempering [11], nested sampling [12,13], Gaussian mixture importance sampling [14] or employment of surrogates [15] were proposed in the literature to reduce the computational burden of estimating BME. However, surrogates include approximation errors due to the reduced models, so that estimated BME values should incorporate a correction factor that helps to assure a reliable model ranking especially under strong computational time constraints [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%