2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00720-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of single-tree characteristics using the kNN method and plotwise aerial photograph interpretations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters in the simulations were set in order to resemble the quality of data that can be expected in practise. Parameters for stand record information based on ocular methods were derived from Eriksson (1990), Ståhl (1992), Holmström (2002), and Holmström et al (2001). Parameters for plot level aerial photo interpretation were derived from Holmström (2002) and Holmström et al (2001), corresponding to results actually obtained in the two test areas in previous studies.…”
Section: Carrier Data Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The parameters in the simulations were set in order to resemble the quality of data that can be expected in practise. Parameters for stand record information based on ocular methods were derived from Eriksson (1990), Ståhl (1992), Holmström (2002), and Holmström et al (2001). Parameters for plot level aerial photo interpretation were derived from Holmström (2002) and Holmström et al (2001), corresponding to results actually obtained in the two test areas in previous studies.…”
Section: Carrier Data Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using plot level aerial photograph interpretations, the values of v t 1 and v t 2 were derived from regression functions using the aerial photo interpreted and stand record variables as regressors. The details are given in Holmström (2002) and Holmström et al (2001). Site index was set equal to the simulated stand record value, while the proportions of pine and spruce at the target plots were set as a weighted average value of the simulated aerial photo interpretations (weight 2/3) and the stand record information (weight 1/3).…”
Section: Knn Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imputations could have been improved considerably with information from covariates on the presence/absence of disturbances. In an inventory based on 400 ha photo-interpreted plots, a second kind of 'correlation-breaker' appears in the form of interpreter-specific factors or through changes in the media or guidelines governing an interpretation (Holmström et al 2001, Holmström 2002, Ståhl et al 2011, Magnussen and Russo 2012. The best strategy to minimize the impact of 'correlationbreakers' is to form strata of disturbed plots and use a logicmodel for the anticipated consequence of a stand-replacing disturbance (Reams andMcCollum 2000, Massey et al 2014).The Canadian NFI is actively in pursuit of this option but an operational system will not be in place for some years to come.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was assessed to be statistically straightforward comparing to the conventional landcover estimation. (Hölmstrom, 2002) used a set of panchromatic aerial photos and field based information from 255 circular sample plots measured within the boreal forests of Sweden. Stem volume and age were modelled and validated, through which 14 % and 17 % of prediction errors (RMSE) for volume and age of the trees were observed, respectively.…”
Section: Remote Sensing For Modelling Forest Structure 21 Forest Attmentioning
confidence: 99%