2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-4036(200105)43:2<219::aid-bimj219>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Selection Parameters using Multi-generation Cytonuclear Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a test of neutrality can be based on the score statistic s(wo), with wo = (1/4, , 1/4). Since s, the derivative of the log-likelihood based on the population gametic relative frequencies, is not computable from the observed data, Datta (2001) suggested using an approximate version of it obtained by replacing them with the corresponding sample versions. This results in additional terms for the variance-covariance matrix, all of which can be consistently estimated from the observed data.…”
Section: A New Test Based On a Selection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a test of neutrality can be based on the score statistic s(wo), with wo = (1/4, , 1/4). Since s, the derivative of the log-likelihood based on the population gametic relative frequencies, is not computable from the observed data, Datta (2001) suggested using an approximate version of it obtained by replacing them with the corresponding sample versions. This results in additional terms for the variance-covariance matrix, all of which can be consistently estimated from the observed data.…”
Section: A New Test Based On a Selection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Datta (2001) for the details of the algebraic calculations. Of course, the approximate score is defined as s(w) ^ (d/dw) I (w) where we interpret it as a function of w = (wι,W2, ws) ( i.e., replace w^ by I -wι -w 2 -w^).…”
Section: A New Test Based On a Selection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations