Estimation of sea surface pCO2 and air–sea CO2 flux in the East China Sea using in-situ and satellite data over the period 2000–2016

Liu, Jing; Bellerby, R. G. J.; Zhu, Qing; Ge, Jianzhong

doi:10.1016/j.csr.2022.104879

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is bounded by Korean Peninsula, Chinese mainland, Taiwan, and the Kyushu and Ryukyu Islands (Figure 1). The circulation of several major water masses (as shown in Figure 1) influences the hydrological environment of the ECS and forming distinctly different physical‐biogeochemical sub‐regions (Liu et al., 2023). The ECS inner shelf is the most heterogeneous region of the ECS as it is strongly affected by Changjiang discharge and coastal waters, receiving a large amount of freshwater, nutrients, organic matter, which is characterized by low SSS and highly active biogeochemical processes (Liu et al., 2010).…”

Section: Data Sources and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating Sea Surface Salinity in the East China Sea Using Satellite Remote Sensing and Machine Learning

Liu,

Bellerby,

Zhu

et al. 2023

Earth and Space Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sea surface salinity (SSS) is a master variable in oceanography and important to understand marine biogeochemical and physical processes. In the East China Sea (ECS), a random forest based regression ensemble model (RF) was developed to estimate the SSS with a spatial resolution of ∼1 km based on a large synchronous data set of in situ SSS observations, MODIS‐derived remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and sea surface temperature (SST). The model showed the best performance when the Rrs(412), Rrs(488), Rrs(555), Rrs(667), SST and Julian day (JD) were used as inputs, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.84, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.31 and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.81 for model training (N = 4,504), and a RMSE of 0.77, MAE of 0.30 and R2 of 0.86 for the model test (N = 1,153). The accuracy of the SSS model was examined using an independent data set during the period of 2020–2022 with a RMSE of 0.66 and MAE of 0.39 (N = 2,151). The interannual and seasonal signal of modeled SSS of the ECS, showed that important drivers of variability are the Changjiang discharge and the East‐Asian monsoon. Applications of the model to other Chinese marginal seas (Yellow and Bohai seas) showed good agreement in distribution patterns when compared with the estimated SSS from NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive. Once more empirical oceanographic data is made available, this robust model can be applied to other regions retraining the model with informed local data sets.

show abstract

Section: Data Sources and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%