2017
DOI: 10.1097/ss.0000000000000197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Saturated Soil Paste Salinity From Soil-Water Extracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
31
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
31
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our expression for the relationship ECe = f(EC1:1) are almost identical to those of Sonmez et al [4] and of Zhang et al [14] who reported approximately twofold dilution when they compared the SP result with 1:1 soil/water extract. For the relationship ECe = f(EC1:5) our results are almost the same with those of Aboukila and Norton [7] who reported that mean ECe value was 5.7 times larger than EC1:5 while Sonmez et al [4] reported that mean ECe value was 8 times larger.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our expression for the relationship ECe = f(EC1:1) are almost identical to those of Sonmez et al [4] and of Zhang et al [14] who reported approximately twofold dilution when they compared the SP result with 1:1 soil/water extract. For the relationship ECe = f(EC1:5) our results are almost the same with those of Aboukila and Norton [7] who reported that mean ECe value was 5.7 times larger than EC1:5 while Sonmez et al [4] reported that mean ECe value was 8 times larger.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The value of the slope when it is imposed the line to pass from the origin is practically unaffected, becoming e 1 : 5 EC 6.47 EC = . These findings are similar to the findings of other researchers [3,4,7,8,15] who also found strong linearity for the relationship ECe = f(EC1: 5). It is to be mentioned that our results do not match exactly with the other researchers' findings but lie in between them.…”
Section: Range Of Ec (Dsm −1 )supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Khorsandi and Yazdi [4] EC e = 7.94 (EC 1:5 ) + 0.27 d EC e = 9.14 (EC 1:5 ) − 15.72 e Sonmez et al [8] EC e = 2.03 (EC 1:1 ) − 0.41 c EC e = 7.36 (EC 1:5 ) − 0.24 c Frazen [10] EC e = 2.96 (EC 1:1 ) − 0.95 Aboukila and Norton [11] EC e = 5.04 (EC 1:5 ) + 0.37 c Chi and Wang [12] EC e = 11.74 (EC 1:5 ) − 6.15 EC e = 11.04 (EC 1:5 ) − 2.41 EC e = 11.68 (EC 1:5 ) − 5.77 Slavich and Petterson [13] EC e = f (EC 1:5 )…”
Section: References Regression Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%