2012
DOI: 10.3736/jcim20120405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of sample size and testing power (Part 7)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the measured properties among different groups were analyzed by two‐way non‐parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA), Scheirer‐Ray‐Hare test using SPSS Version 19.0 (SPSS GmbH, Munich, Germany). In order to assess the probability of a Type II error (false negative, known as β ), retrospective statistical power analysis was performed for each variable based on a sample size of 5, at a significance α level of 0.05, actual difference observed in our study according to the method described by Hu et al Furthermore, if there were significant differences among the different groups, a pairwise t ‐test was used to compare similar variables between groups at each time point and Bonferroni adjustment was used to reduce the probability of Type I error (false positive) of multiple comparisons. After Bonferroni adjustment procedure, the significance value for individual tests was set at p < 0.017 ( α adj = α / m , where m is the number of tests).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the measured properties among different groups were analyzed by two‐way non‐parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA), Scheirer‐Ray‐Hare test using SPSS Version 19.0 (SPSS GmbH, Munich, Germany). In order to assess the probability of a Type II error (false negative, known as β ), retrospective statistical power analysis was performed for each variable based on a sample size of 5, at a significance α level of 0.05, actual difference observed in our study according to the method described by Hu et al Furthermore, if there were significant differences among the different groups, a pairwise t ‐test was used to compare similar variables between groups at each time point and Bonferroni adjustment was used to reduce the probability of Type I error (false positive) of multiple comparisons. After Bonferroni adjustment procedure, the significance value for individual tests was set at p < 0.017 ( α adj = α / m , where m is the number of tests).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%