2014
DOI: 10.11001/jksww.2014.28.6.635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of runoff coefficient through impervious covers analysis using long-term outflow simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assessed as an extremely high runoff coefficient compared to the 0.05-0.10 of grass plains (sandy soil, 2% slope)-a coefficient used in the rational formula evaluation model proposed by Mulvaney in a study related to a typical runoff coefficient [96]. Moreover, although brick blocks had a coefficient of 0.70-0.85 in previous studies, this study proposes that the runoff coefficient must be continuously studied for comparison through additional experiments because brick blocks were found to have a coefficient of 0.963 in this study [102][103][104][105][106]. By using the following experimental method, the runoff coefficient's calculation can generate data that complement the drawbacks of previous studies, where differences occur in calculating the runoff coefficient due to the user's subjectivity [107].…”
Section: Calculating the Runoff Coefficient According To The Land Cov...mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It was assessed as an extremely high runoff coefficient compared to the 0.05-0.10 of grass plains (sandy soil, 2% slope)-a coefficient used in the rational formula evaluation model proposed by Mulvaney in a study related to a typical runoff coefficient [96]. Moreover, although brick blocks had a coefficient of 0.70-0.85 in previous studies, this study proposes that the runoff coefficient must be continuously studied for comparison through additional experiments because brick blocks were found to have a coefficient of 0.963 in this study [102][103][104][105][106]. By using the following experimental method, the runoff coefficient's calculation can generate data that complement the drawbacks of previous studies, where differences occur in calculating the runoff coefficient due to the user's subjectivity [107].…”
Section: Calculating the Runoff Coefficient According To The Land Cov...mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Advantages Limitations [14] Insufficient data updated using the daily data at a nearby, hydrologically similar gauging station Insufficient evaluation of hydrologically similar observation points [12,15] Flow data estimated using TANK model with respect to sampling frequency Estimated data affected by various artifacts (e.g., a dam) located near the study area [10,16] Extended daily flow data from 8-day interval flow data using SWAT model High-flow regime faces high uncertainty due to scarce high-flow measurements [17][18][19][20][21][22] Emphasizes the advantages of daily discharge data for constructing FDCs and the importance of daily timestep hydrological information for water resource management However, due to the construction of various artifacts, such as weirs, reservoirs, and agricultural waterways, the hydrological modeling is facing difficulties that result in uncertainties. Thus, a study on the development of the daily flow expansion regression equations employing the 8-day interval measurement data in the monitoring networks has been implemented to evaluate the annual pollutant load characteristics for flow conditions [7].…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%