2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-022-02764-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of rock joint diameter distribution using numerically generated joint center volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the population characteristics of target rock joints should be estimated first to be taken as a reference for determining representative specimens. Herein, the maximum likelihood approach, which has been shown to effectively deal with the effect of variability (Lee et al, 2022), is adopted to estimate the population characteristics. As shown in Section 2, the shear strength of specimens on the field slate rock joint matches the normal distribution.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the population characteristics of target rock joints should be estimated first to be taken as a reference for determining representative specimens. Herein, the maximum likelihood approach, which has been shown to effectively deal with the effect of variability (Lee et al, 2022), is adopted to estimate the population characteristics. As shown in Section 2, the shear strength of specimens on the field slate rock joint matches the normal distribution.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, dip direction and dip angle obey uniform distribution or normal distribution, and their distribution may be correlated. 34,35 The joint density often follows a Fish distribution, 36 and the spacing and trace length generally follow a negative exponential distribution or lognormal distribution, [37][38][39][40] but the distribution of the bridge length is rarely considered. The main reasons are that it is difficult to measure the length of the rock bridge in the field survey, and it is difficult to consider the distribution of the rock bridge by the disc model or elliptical model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%