2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3630-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of respiratory volume from thoracoabdominal breathing distances: comparison of two models of machine learning

Abstract: Our results demonstrate that this new processing approach for RMP seems to be a valid tool for estimating V with sufficient accuracy during lying, sitting and standing and under various exercise conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, female volunteers will be included in next experimental tests. Nevertheless, the authors recognize that future work has to be done in order to evaluate the accuracy of volume measurements between tests on the same volunteer by adopting the same calibration matrix; this investigation will allow figuring out the intra‐subject variability within different trials .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, female volunteers will be included in next experimental tests. Nevertheless, the authors recognize that future work has to be done in order to evaluate the accuracy of volume measurements between tests on the same volunteer by adopting the same calibration matrix; this investigation will allow figuring out the intra‐subject variability within different trials .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in RMP sensors can become non-linear at higher intensities resulting in outcomes outside the calibrated range (38). In the studies mentioned earlier, the bias and limits of agreement increase with increased activity (39,52,55). However, during exercise measurement of dynamic volume with RIP are still comparable to spirometry values.…”
Section: Movementmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Multiple systems are commercially available (40,(68)(69)(70), and an even greater number of systems is self-made (33,39). Not all systems have the same accuracy.…”
Section: How Accurate Are Telemonitoring Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between a machine-learning based model and measurements of respiratory rate was performed by Dumond et al [20].…”
Section: Current Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a conclusion, the following average values can be used for adults:  low activity (breathing while lying): 0.45 m 3 /h [19]  low activity (breathing while sitting, standing or talking): 0.54 m 3 /h [19,20]  singing: 0.65 m 3 /h [21]  mid activity (physical work): 0.9 m 3 /h [20]  sports: 1.2 m 3 /h [18,20] For children, the lung volume is smaller. Therefore, the respiratory rate for children aged 14 can be assumed to be 0.45 m 3 /h for low activity (breathing while sitting, standing, talking) [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%