2022
DOI: 10.1061/jpeodx.0000378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Resilient Modulus Constitutive Model Parameters for Unbound Coarse Materials for MEPDG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, to attain a more comprehensive understanding of the stabilization durability, the RLTTs are performed both before and after the exposure of the samples to 10 FT cycles. Differently from other most common and rapid experimental procedures like UCS and CBR tests (Araya et al, 2010), RLTT is non-destructive and the obtained results can be directly implemented into a mechanistic-empirical road design (Alnedawi et al, 2022;Chowdhury and Kassem, 2022;Ghadimi and Nikraz, 2017;Titi and Matar, 2018). As reported in Table 1, only one previous study has employed RLTT to compare the effects of traditional and nontraditional soil stabilizers in connection with FT cycles (Pierre et al, 2008).…”
Section: Novelty and Structure Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to attain a more comprehensive understanding of the stabilization durability, the RLTTs are performed both before and after the exposure of the samples to 10 FT cycles. Differently from other most common and rapid experimental procedures like UCS and CBR tests (Araya et al, 2010), RLTT is non-destructive and the obtained results can be directly implemented into a mechanistic-empirical road design (Alnedawi et al, 2022;Chowdhury and Kassem, 2022;Ghadimi and Nikraz, 2017;Titi and Matar, 2018). As reported in Table 1, only one previous study has employed RLTT to compare the effects of traditional and nontraditional soil stabilizers in connection with FT cycles (Pierre et al, 2008).…”
Section: Novelty and Structure Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%