The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13041048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration with Three Different Machine Learning Models and Limited Meteorological Variables

Abstract: Precise reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) estimation plays a key role in agricultural fields as it aids in the proper operation and management of irrigation scheduling. However, reliable ET0 estimation poses a challenge when there is insufficient or incomplete long-term meteorological data at the East Coast Economic Region (ECER), Malaysia, where the economy is highly dependent on agricultural crop production. This study evaluated the performances of different standalone machine learning (ML) models, nam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Loukkos, the ranking was: LightGBM6>XGBoost6>LightGBM3>XGBoost3 with average RMSE of 0.025 -0.027 mm.day −1 . These findings support previous studies by Fan et al [32] and Yong et al [28], where LightGBM consistently outperformed other standalone ML models with an RMSE of 0.08-0.58 mm.day −1 and 0.041-0.315 mm.day −1 , respectively. Further, there was a minor difference between…”
Section: Comparison Of Standalone and Hybrid ML Models Using Various ...supporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For Loukkos, the ranking was: LightGBM6>XGBoost6>LightGBM3>XGBoost3 with average RMSE of 0.025 -0.027 mm.day −1 . These findings support previous studies by Fan et al [32] and Yong et al [28], where LightGBM consistently outperformed other standalone ML models with an RMSE of 0.08-0.58 mm.day −1 and 0.041-0.315 mm.day −1 , respectively. Further, there was a minor difference between…”
Section: Comparison Of Standalone and Hybrid ML Models Using Various ...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Goyal et al [27] highlighted the promising findings of ML models in various climates and environments, emphasizing their ability to improve accuracy above standard empirical models. Besides, researchers have applied various ML models, such as artificial neural networks (ANN) [28,29], support vector regression (SVR) [30], M5 model tree [31], random forests (RF) [32], reduced error pruning tree (REPTree) [33], extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [34], light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) [28] and decision trees (DT) [35] to estimate daily RET uing restricted meteorological data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this model, the IOT framework using the dataset helps to analyse the attributes and control of remote sensing devices like humidity sensors, temperature sensors, and moisturizer sensors [14]. Decision trees and ANN combine to predict crops using meteorological attributes like air temperature, wind speed, and solar radiation [15,16]. Various approaches are used to solve the problem using DL algorithms, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and long-short-term memory (LSTM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%