2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2009.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of pure component properties. Part 4: Estimation of the saturated liquid viscosity of non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
453
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(8 reference statements)
14
453
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to provide a quantitative comparison for the sensitivity of our model predictions with respect to p° values, we provide here a case comparison with three distinct p° estimation methods: (i) EVAPORATION, (ii) the method of Nannoolal et al 94 with normal boiling point temperatures (T b ) estimated by the model of Nannoolal et al 95 (denoted in the following as N-N method) and (iii) the method by Myrdal and Yalkowsky 96 with T b estimation by the model of Nannoolal et al 95 (denoted in the following as MY-N method). As noted by O'Meara et al 92 , the EVAPORATION and N-N methods are typically better suited for predictions of p° of low volatility compounds, while the MY-N method has been shown to have a high bias in the predicted p° of low volatility compounds.…”
Section: Supplementary Information Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to provide a quantitative comparison for the sensitivity of our model predictions with respect to p° values, we provide here a case comparison with three distinct p° estimation methods: (i) EVAPORATION, (ii) the method of Nannoolal et al 94 with normal boiling point temperatures (T b ) estimated by the model of Nannoolal et al 95 (denoted in the following as N-N method) and (iii) the method by Myrdal and Yalkowsky 96 with T b estimation by the model of Nannoolal et al 95 (denoted in the following as MY-N method). As noted by O'Meara et al 92 , the EVAPORATION and N-N methods are typically better suited for predictions of p° of low volatility compounds, while the MY-N method has been shown to have a high bias in the predicted p° of low volatility compounds.…”
Section: Supplementary Information Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) N-N method: estimation of p° by the method of Nannoolal et al 94 with required normal boiling point temperatures (T b ) estimated by the model of Nannoolal et al 95 ; obtained using the UManSysProp property predictive techniques online tool (http://umansysprop.seaes.manchester.ac.uk; by Topping et al 98 . (c) MY-N method: estimation of p° by the method of Myrdal and Yalkowsky 96 with T b estimation by the model of Nannoolal et al 95 ; obtained using the UManSysProp tool.…”
Section: Supplementary Information Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Topping et al, 2013). The methods of organic vapour pressure and boiling point estimation according to Nannoolal et al (2008Nannoolal et al ( , 2004 and non-ideality (including solute-solute interactions) according to AIOMFAC (Zuend et al, 2011;Zuend et al, 2008) were used. A nominal 0.005 nmol m −3 ammonium sulfate seed was assumed (currently, UManSysProp does not allow for inorganic charge imbalance) and particulate organic mass concentrations were compared between conditions typical of the top of the boundary layer (295 K, 80 % RH) and the lowest altitude sampled (302 K, 60 % RH).…”
Section: Boundary Layer Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ξ is the activity coefficient of the species in the condensed phase (assumed to be unity) and p 0 L (Torr) is the saturation vapour pressure. Estimates for p 0 L can be derived from structure-based methods 1 (Stein and Brown, 1994;Myrdal and Yalkowsky, 1997;Nannoolal et al, 2004;Moller et al, 2008;Nannoolal et al, 2008;Compernolle et al, 2011). The partitioning of organic acids is also influenced by their dissociation in the particle phase which depends on pH (−log[H + ]).…”
Section: Partitioning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%