2017 19th International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems (ISAP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/isap.2017.8071383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of power system inertia using particle swarm optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 presents the results of the inertia estimation for this case study. The results obtained demonstrate that there was concordance and that the results were better in comparison with the results reported in [24,25,37], where the error in the estimation was between 0.22% and 41.11%. On the other hand, [11] reported an estimation error of 16%.…”
Section: Analysis and Comparison Of The Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 presents the results of the inertia estimation for this case study. The results obtained demonstrate that there was concordance and that the results were better in comparison with the results reported in [24,25,37], where the error in the estimation was between 0.22% and 41.11%. On the other hand, [11] reported an estimation error of 16%.…”
Section: Analysis and Comparison Of The Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For this case, it was a small disturbance. Nevertheless, the results are still good in comparison with the results reported in the literature, whose values were between 0.22 %, 41.11% [24,25,37], and 16%, reported in [11].…”
Section: Load Incrementsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existing literature on power system parameter identification mainly centers on system inertia [11], and it can be further divided into offline and online identification methods. The offline identification method is typically based on the historical operation data after large power disturbances, such as generator outages [15], [16], which can help to reduce the influences from the dead-band of the governor and noise in the PMU data. However, offline identification cannot deliver the real-time identification result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%