2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of pixel-level seismic vulnerability of the building environment based on mid-resolution optical remote sensing images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies previously attempted to estimate vulnerability to various hazards like floods (Guo et al, 2021) and seismicity (Fan et al, 2021). However, attempts to assess the spatiotemporal changes are still sporadic.…”
Section: Correlation Of Ntl With Factors Driving Flood Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies previously attempted to estimate vulnerability to various hazards like floods (Guo et al, 2021) and seismicity (Fan et al, 2021). However, attempts to assess the spatiotemporal changes are still sporadic.…”
Section: Correlation Of Ntl With Factors Driving Flood Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies related to vulnerability assessment using NTL data are very limited. Only a few attempts have been made in recent years to assess vulnerability to different hazards using NTL data (Ceola et al, 2015;Fan et al, 2021;Y. Li et al, 2021;Mård et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to that, e.g., Borfecchia et al (2010), Geiß et al (2015a, 2017b, 2018, Liuzzi et al (2019), Liu et al (2019), Torres et al (2019), and An et al (2021) combined limited in situ ground truth information characterizing the building inventory with features from remote sensing and use techniques of statistical inference for a complete labeling of the residual building inventory according to specific vulnerability levels or more generic properties such as construction material or occupancy, respectively. Related methodological principles were also exploited by, e.g., Wieland et al (2012Wieland et al ( , 2016, Wieland (2013), Geiß et al (2016), Pittore et al (2020), andFan et al (2021) to assess seismic vulnerability or related parameters on a coarser spatial level to allow for the use of data with larger spatial coverage. Recently, Aravena Pelizari et al (2021) deployed street-level imagery that was extracted from the GoogleStreetView platform and classified various seismic structural types with deep learning models to automatically compile relevant in situ data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high-resolution optical satellite imagery in Germany allowed the extraction of building shape, position, and height to some extent [5]. In Yancheng, China, a mid-resolution satellite imagery in the study areas provided seismic vulnerability estimation while field investigation calibrated the assessment [6]. Given the limitations of these methods, further inquiry in the potential of remote sensing can provide a convenient, but not ultimate, assessment of seismic vulnerability of buildings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%