2012
DOI: 10.1785/0120120047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration from Horizontal Rigid Body Displacement: A Case Study in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

Abstract: The M 7.0 Haiti earthquake of 12 January 2010 caused catastrophic damage and loss of life in the capital city of Port-au-Prince. The extent of the damage was primarily due to poor construction and high population density. The earthquake was recorded by only a single seismic instrument within Haiti, an educational seismometer that was neither bolted to the ground nor able to record strong motion on scale. The severity of near-field mainshock ground motions, in Port-au-Prince and elsewhere, has thus remained unc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For stations farther away from the rupture area, we find a PGA of (∼0.15 g) for PRY and PGv and less than 0.1 g for TPM which are still significantly lower than the other studies. In Port-au-Prince, our estimate of ∼0.1 g is close to that of Hough et al [2012], who used a rigid body displacement method to estimate a PGA of ∼0.2 g, significantly lower than those reported by Mavroeidis and Scotti [2013], Olson et al [2011], and the USGS shake map, where PGA is ∼0.3 g. The reason for this discrepancy is because PGA is usually controlled by high frequencies which our models could not generate since the highest frequency of the mesh is 2.3 Hz, and we had to filter the ground acceleration in order to reduce the digital noises. Also, these generated synthetics do not take into account any site effects, which have been shown to be important in Port-au-Prince in particular [Hough et al, 2010[Hough et al, , 2011, but are not considered in our modeling.…”
Section: Ground Motion In the Near Fieldsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For stations farther away from the rupture area, we find a PGA of (∼0.15 g) for PRY and PGv and less than 0.1 g for TPM which are still significantly lower than the other studies. In Port-au-Prince, our estimate of ∼0.1 g is close to that of Hough et al [2012], who used a rigid body displacement method to estimate a PGA of ∼0.2 g, significantly lower than those reported by Mavroeidis and Scotti [2013], Olson et al [2011], and the USGS shake map, where PGA is ∼0.3 g. The reason for this discrepancy is because PGA is usually controlled by high frequencies which our models could not generate since the highest frequency of the mesh is 2.3 Hz, and we had to filter the ground acceleration in order to reduce the digital noises. Also, these generated synthetics do not take into account any site effects, which have been shown to be important in Port-au-Prince in particular [Hough et al, 2010[Hough et al, , 2011, but are not considered in our modeling.…”
Section: Ground Motion In the Near Fieldsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Dynamic rupture studies have shown that complexities, such as fault roughness or stochastic stress asperities, can lead a rupture to reach higher fre-quencies (Oglesby & Day 2002;Shi & Day 2013, Lozos et al 2015. Furthermore, Hough et al (2012) used a rigid body displacement technique and inferred a PGA value of ∼0.2 g in Port-au-Prince, not too far off from that of Douilly et al (2015). The U.S. Geological Survey ShakeMap and Olson et al (2011) estimated the PGA in Port-au-Prince to be of the order of 0.3 g. Goodno et al (2011) correlated average structural damage at specific sites to estimated ground motion from other studies to infer a mean PGA in Port-au-Prince of the order of 0.13-0.47 g. Finally, Mavroeidis & Scotti (2013) used the coseismic slip distribution from Hayes et al (2010) to simulate broad-band ground motions by combining low-frequency synthetics generated using the discrete wavenumber representation method (Bouchon 1979) with high-frequency synthetics generated using the SBM (Papageorgiou & Aki 1983a,b;Papageorgiou 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There exist various types of earthquake problems; a typical case study for estimating peak ground acceleration (PGA) and a detailed review of recent efforts in predictions can be seen in the previous literatures [3,4]. The present study focuses on the topic of using seismic recorded parameters and site soil conditions to evaluate the potential damage resulting from ground strong motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%