2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10043-016-0179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of partial optical path length in the brain in subject-specific head models for near-infrared spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such individual anatomical difference is illustrated by evidence that each individual subject exhibits unique scalp and skull thickness, CSF distributions and cortical folding patterns (Hasan et al, 2007; H. Li, Ruan, Xie, Wang, & Liu, 2007). Moreover, a recent study provided direct evidence supporting our findings, because the partial optical pathlength in the brain decreases with an increase in the scalp‐brain distance varying with individuals and across brain regions (Nakamura et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such individual anatomical difference is illustrated by evidence that each individual subject exhibits unique scalp and skull thickness, CSF distributions and cortical folding patterns (Hasan et al, 2007; H. Li, Ruan, Xie, Wang, & Liu, 2007). Moreover, a recent study provided direct evidence supporting our findings, because the partial optical pathlength in the brain decreases with an increase in the scalp‐brain distance varying with individuals and across brain regions (Nakamura et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several studies have shown that the anatomical structure affects the sensitivity of the fNIRS signal by using realistic 3D head models (Custo, Wells, Barnett, Hillman, & Boas, 2006; Fukui, Ajichi, & Okada, 2003; Hoshi, Shimada, Sato, & Iguchi, 2005; Strangman et al, 2003). In particular, by constructing subject‐specific head models, Nakamura et al found that variability of the partial optical pathlength in the brain was very high between subjects and between fiducial points, and that partial optical pathlength was strongly associated with the depth of the brain surface (Nakamura et al, 2016). Moreover, the partial optical pathlength of the fNIRS probe pair depends not only on the individual's head structure, but also on the local head structure to which the probe is attached, even for the same individual subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of constant DPF values seems less-than-ideal because DPF values vary largely across individuals [122,123,193,194] and depend on (i) the wavelength used [122,123,192,194], (ii) the cortical area measured [122,123,190,192,195,196], (iii) the participants’ age [122,123,192,197], (iv) the size of the detector area [189], and (v) the source–detector separation [189]. Furthermore, as recently observed, the DPF can also change during the experiment [198].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the sixteen reviewed studies investigating the effect of ageing on fNIRS activity reported the DPF values used. The depth of the cortex will also affect the DPF, with considerable intersubject variability and differences between scalp locations having been reported (Nakamura et al, 2016). The effect of age related cortical thinning and grey matter atrophy may increase the cortical depth in addition to increasing the amount of cerebrospinal fluid in the subarachnoid space which would affect light attenuation (Purdon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Influence Of Ageing and Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of DPF are both age and wavelength dependent and display high intersubject variability (Duncan et al, 1996;Duncan et al, 1995). The mean optical path length also varies spatially and increases with depth of the brain surface (Nakamura et al, 2016). Another factor is what outcome measures are selected for statistical analysis, for example HbO 2 , HbR, total haemoglobin or a combination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%