1993
DOI: 10.1006/gmip.1993.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Noise in Images: An Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, in [8], a block-based noise estimation method was proposed, with a new measure for determining intensity-homogeneous blocks and a structure analyzer for rejecting blocks with structure. They showed to outperform the methods of [4] and [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, in [8], a block-based noise estimation method was proposed, with a new measure for determining intensity-homogeneous blocks and a structure analyzer for rejecting blocks with structure. They showed to outperform the methods of [4] and [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some of those noise estimation approaches were evaluated and compared in [10], where it was concluded that the averaging approach, which is based on first suppressing image structures by prefiltering and then computing the noise variance, provides the most reliable results for a wide range of noise levels and images with different content. Recently, in [8], a block-based noise estimation method was proposed, with a new measure for determining intensity-homogeneous blocks and a structure analyzer for rejecting blocks with structure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a, was chosen for analysis and both the original NLM algorithm and the statistically motivated variant incorporating scale adjustment were applied. Noise was estimated directly ( [14]) from the image in the region of the brain and patch similarities computed over a 7x7 region (shown in previous work [11] to provide an optimal balance between accuracy and required processor power for the original NLM algorithm).…”
Section: Clinical Mr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is referred to as the residual outlier measure (ROM) and, since the expected value for a perfect noise filter can be calculated as the two-tailed integral of the noise distribution beyond 3σ, any deviation from this expected value quantifies the number of pixels to which inappropriate smoothing is applied. The local image noise was estimated independently of the Monte-Carlo stability analysis using a technique based upon the distribution of local derivatives [14]. In order to provide a benchmark for the evaluation, it was also applied to three conventional noise filtering schemes.…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluation Of Non-local Meansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] several other models are presented for estimating image noise. When maximising autocorrelation the MNF analysis qualifies as an Independent Components Analysis (ICA) similar to the Molgedy-Schuster algorithm [14], see [5].…”
Section: Minimum Noise Fractions Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%