2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of neutron-irradiation-induced defect in 3C–SiC from change in XRD peak shift and DFT study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also noticed that the peaks in the spectrum of 10% Coe2%Ce/ZrO 2 catalyst shifted to lower 2q values indicating expansion of interplanar spacing [27] as also shown with dspacing values in Table 1. This might be attributed to lattice mismatching and/or distortion [28] due to more lattice oxygen vacancies in this sample [29].…”
Section: Characterization Of Coece/zro 2 Systemsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It was also noticed that the peaks in the spectrum of 10% Coe2%Ce/ZrO 2 catalyst shifted to lower 2q values indicating expansion of interplanar spacing [27] as also shown with dspacing values in Table 1. This might be attributed to lattice mismatching and/or distortion [28] due to more lattice oxygen vacancies in this sample [29].…”
Section: Characterization Of Coece/zro 2 Systemsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The pre-wash results indicate that increased NaCl content in the samples generally shifted the NaCl peak from 31.2 to 31.4 and 31.7 • , i.e., from left to right, for 5, 10, and 20%-NaCl content, respectively. This shifting of the peak to a lower angle indicates expansion of the space lattice [45,46]. In the BET surface area analysis discussed above (Section 3.2.1.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3. With an increase in temperature, the position of the (002) peak gradually shifts towards a lower 2θ value, which may be due to the lattice mismatch of the (002) surface or the in-situ growth of some defects [53]. In contrast, the (100) peak does not change, indicating that the increase in temperature has no effect on the (100) surface.…”
Section: Gas Distribution and Pneumatic Control Box Gas Gasmentioning
confidence: 98%