2023
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2023.3262164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Lower Extremity Joint Moments and 3D Ground Reaction Forces Using IMU Sensors in Multiple Walking Conditions: A Deep Learning Approach

Abstract: Human kinetics, specifically joint moments and ground reaction forces (GRFs) can provide important clinical information and can be used to control assistive devices. Traditionally, collection of kinetics is mostly limited to the lab environment because it relies on data that measured from a motion capture system and floor-embedded force plates to calculate the dynamics via musculoskeletal models. This spatially limited method makes it extremely challenging to measure kinetics outside the laboratory in a variet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the performance of our pretrained models is comparable to or slightly higher than those reported in prior studies that used the same downstream datasets for vGRF estimation. Specifically, a prior deep learning model achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.96 ± 0.01 for overground walking and 0.96 ± 0.01 for treadmill walking [50], while our models achieved 0.95 ± 0.02 and 0.97 ± 0.01, respectively. Another prior deep learning model achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.92±0.11 [27] for vGRF estimation during drop landing, while our model achieved 0.93 ± 0.04.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Also, the performance of our pretrained models is comparable to or slightly higher than those reported in prior studies that used the same downstream datasets for vGRF estimation. Specifically, a prior deep learning model achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.96 ± 0.01 for overground walking and 0.96 ± 0.01 for treadmill walking [50], while our models achieved 0.95 ± 0.02 and 0.97 ± 0.01, respectively. Another prior deep learning model achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.92±0.11 [27] for vGRF estimation during drop landing, while our model achieved 0.93 ± 0.04.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, many machine learning models do not provide a complete analysis but estimate only a small number of variables for a specific application, for example, vertical GRF and knee flexion angle ( Wouda et al, 2018 ) or knee flexion and adduction moments ( Stetter et al, 2020 ). Moreover, separate machine learning models were trained for kinematics and kinetics without taking the physical relation of the estimated variables into account ( Mundt et al, 2021 ; Hossain et al, 2023 ). These drawbacks make machine learning models poorly generalizable to other applications and hinder explainability of potential biomechanical findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) We simplify the inertial forces and moments distributed in the human body, resulting in a pair of forces and moments in the same direction ( F and T in Figure 4). The specific calculation process is described in Equations ( 13)- (15). First, the resultant force and the resultant moment at point O 0 can be calculated as…”
Section: Reducing the Moment Components Based On The Centers Of Press...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, dynamics-modeling-based methods calculate the moments of exoskeletons' joints according to the contact forces and moments (CFMs) as well as inverse dynamics [11][12][13][14]. CFMs can be detected using well-designed high-precision force sensors [15][16][17][18][19]. However, comfortable, portable, and high-precision force sensors for measuring these CFMs are difficult to design and manufacture [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%