AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Longitudinal Unsteady Aerodynamics of a Wing-Tail Combination from Wind Tunnel Data

Abstract: This paper presents an initial step toward model identification from wind tunnel data for an airliner configuration. Two approaches to modeling a transport configuration are considered and applied to both steady and large-amplitude forced-oscillation wind tunnel data taken over a wide range of angles of attack. Only limited conclusions could be drawn from this initial data set. Although model estimated time histories of normal force and pitching moment agree reasonably well with the corresponding measured valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26][27] provided further insights into modeling aerodynamic responses for configuration components of body-tail, bodywing, and body-wing-tail. Calculation of steady downwash and aerodynamic center change with respect to angle of attack were performed in [26] for the GTM configuration and in [28] for a model provided by the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI). Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27] provided further insights into modeling aerodynamic responses for configuration components of body-tail, bodywing, and body-wing-tail. Calculation of steady downwash and aerodynamic center change with respect to angle of attack were performed in [26] for the GTM configuration and in [28] for a model provided by the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI). Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 were used again in model identification and the results are summarized in Ref. 12. The identified models for different configurations mostly fit the measured data quite well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%