2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61294-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of leaf nutrition status in degraded vegetation based on field survey and hyperspectral data

Abstract: Timely monitoring of global plant biogeochemical processes demands fast and highly accurate estimation of plant nutrition status, which is often estimated based on hyperspectral data. However, few such studies have been conducted on degraded vegetation. In this study, complete combinations of either original reflectance or first-order derivative spectra have been developed to quantify leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contents of tree, shrub, and grass species using hyperspectral datasets fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A poor prediction accuracy was found by [93] exploiting the Inverted red-edge chlorophyll index (R 2 = 0.66), relative normalized difference index (R 2 = 0.48), red-edge chlorophyll index (R 2 = 0.28), and normalized difference infrared index ranged R 2 = 0.28−0.67 for the coffee canopy N using satellite data. Thus, our results on the poor performance of spectral or vegetation indices are consistent with those reported by [11,93], among others. Prediction accuracy of R 2 = 0.16−0.48 was obtained by [94] to predict the N:P ratio of the grass vegetation using previously published vegetation indices computed from the satellite data however the performance was improved to R 2 = 0.59−0.72 with optimized vegetation indices.…”
Section: Vegetation Indicessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A poor prediction accuracy was found by [93] exploiting the Inverted red-edge chlorophyll index (R 2 = 0.66), relative normalized difference index (R 2 = 0.48), red-edge chlorophyll index (R 2 = 0.28), and normalized difference infrared index ranged R 2 = 0.28−0.67 for the coffee canopy N using satellite data. Thus, our results on the poor performance of spectral or vegetation indices are consistent with those reported by [11,93], among others. Prediction accuracy of R 2 = 0.16−0.48 was obtained by [94] to predict the N:P ratio of the grass vegetation using previously published vegetation indices computed from the satellite data however the performance was improved to R 2 = 0.59−0.72 with optimized vegetation indices.…”
Section: Vegetation Indicessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Normalized difference spectral indices were effectively used by [91] and [92] to estimate leaf N, P, or K content in different plant species. In [11], a poor prediction of already published 43 empirical spectral indices for the N, P, and K content of the shrub and grass vegetation in China was recorded. Furthermore, to overcome this, the linear regression analysis to optimize the band-band combination was performed and effectively retrieved the leaf N, P, and K content (R 2 > 0.5, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Vegetation Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it is worthwhile to continue with an experimental approach by applying climbing chalk on unclimbed rock and study its in situ impact on rock‐dwelling species (besides bryophytes and ferns, also including lichens and flowering plants) on different rock types. Finally, recent advances in drone and imaging technology may allow for mapping and analyzing visible climbing chalk traces and vegetation health along climbing routes with hyperspectral imaging by means of unmanned aerial vehicles (Peng et al., 2020; Strumia, Buonanno, Aronne, Santo, & Santangelo, 2020; Zhang, Zhang, Wei, Wang, & Huang, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major determining components of vegetation include biochemical constituents that are central to their physiological form and function, along with water, chlorophyll, and accessory pigments, nitrogen, cellulose, starch, sugars, lignin, and protein. These are the mandatory parameters for describing the nutritional status of any tree of a particular ecosystem [2,3], while the secondary metabolites such as terpenes, sesquiterpenes, phytosterols, etc., are more useful to humans [4], which makes the plant economically valuable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%