2012
DOI: 10.2298/tsci1204027r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of laser-Doppler anemometry measuring volume displacement in cylindrical pipe flow

Abstract: Laser-Doppler anemometry application in measurements of the 3-D swirl turbulent flow velocity in the cylindrical pipe, behind the axial fan, have been analysed. This paper presents a brief overview of uncertainty sources in the laser-Doppler anemometry measurements. Special attention is paid to estimation of laser-Doppler anemometry measuring volume positioning in cylindrical pipe flow due to optical aberrations, caused by the pipe wall curvature. The hypothesis, that in the central part of the pipe (r/R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each measurement point, the analog signal from the processor, by means of an oscilloscope, was accurately checked, to verify the Doppler signal quality [11,44]. LDV provides flow velocity data having high quality, and therefore, it still remains the preferred measuring technique for complex turbulent flows' study [44], confirming the adequacy of fluid velocity measurements based on frequency acquisition and analysis [11,13,45,46]. In Nezu and Sanjou [13] and Nezu and Onitsuka [45], the most accurate measurement device was LDV, and the accuracy of PIV (particle image velocimetry) was evaluated by comparing PIV data with LDA data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each measurement point, the analog signal from the processor, by means of an oscilloscope, was accurately checked, to verify the Doppler signal quality [11,44]. LDV provides flow velocity data having high quality, and therefore, it still remains the preferred measuring technique for complex turbulent flows' study [44], confirming the adequacy of fluid velocity measurements based on frequency acquisition and analysis [11,13,45,46]. In Nezu and Sanjou [13] and Nezu and Onitsuka [45], the most accurate measurement device was LDV, and the accuracy of PIV (particle image velocimetry) was evaluated by comparing PIV data with LDA data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-1148 consumption, during wind tunnel (WT) testing, researchers introduced well-known infrared thermography (IRT) into investigating the set of the wind tunnel measuring and visualizing methods. The goal of this work was primarily to investigate the applicability of the thermodynamic method -IRT [1], for flow description and boundary-layer transition detection in the experimental practice in the small low-speed WT of the Military Technical Institute (VTI) [2][3][4][5][6] and by the CFD. In addition, the aim was to observe the possibilities of application of the high-speed train testing [4] for defining the requirements for future adjustments, developments of the model, set-up, and the equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern trends in measurements of the boundary-layer and the flow field are focused on non-destructive, energy efficient experimental methods. The high-quality methods are the methods such as the Laser-Doppler anemometry [5], the holographic interferometry [3], the particle image velocimetry (PIV) [8], and IRT. The IRT, for example, is applied in different areas of science and technology, such as fluid dynamics [9,10], insulation monitoring of the industrial facilities [11,12], humidity monitoring of buildings, museums and heritage buildings, civil objects energy efficiency detection, the detection of the processes in installations (heating/ cooling and electric), inside and out of the rigid walls, studying of the artefacts, inspection of the structure of construction materials, smart machines, surveillance and military use, and medicine (IR mammography).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…对 LDA 测量产生诸多不利影响: 测速位置发生偏移; 测速方位和大小发生改变;多普勒信号强度和数据有 效率下降。多维探头受其影响更严重,可能导致多维 光束聚焦困难,无法实现多维实时协同测量。 平板窗口是 LDA 实际应用所遇到最多的情况, 因此国内外对于 LDA 折射效应的研究就主要集中 于平板折射效应,徐兴祺等 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] 均对 LDA 平板折射 效应进行了研究,包括激光斜入射情况,推导了测 量体折射后的位置修正模型,尤其是赵军等 [4] 还研 机 械 工 程 学 报 第 54 卷第 2 期期 226 究了二维探头蓝光和绿光测量体经过平板折射效应 不重合的慧差现象。 图 1 液力变矩器 而对于曲面 LDA 折射效应的研究集中于管道壁 面(即圆柱壁面)折射效应,除了进行折射率匹配 [8][9][10] 、 管道壁面加窗 [5] 等物理修正方法减小折射效应的影响 外,许多学者对管道壁面折射效应进行了理论计算。 徐兴祺 [1] 对激光光束垂直入射 0 厚度圆柱壁面情况 下,折射效应对测量体位置的影响进行了理论推导。 ZHANG 等 [5,11] 研究了激光光束垂直和斜入射圆柱壁 面对测量体位置、条纹间距、所测速度方向和速度误 差的影响,并同平板窗口分析一样,着重分析了斜入 射角度和平板厚度对二维探头蓝绿测量体间距的影 响。RISTIC 等 [12] 研究了不同壁厚、半径和光束半夹 角对 LDA 探头光轴非垂直入射圆柱壁面管道中测量 体位置及速度方向的影响。 DOUKELIS 等 [13] …”
unclassified