2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8487199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Knee Joint Angle Using a Fabric-Based Strain Sensor and Machine Learning: A Preliminary Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Random forest is an ensemble of decision trees that has shown promising results when compared with conventional machine learning algorithms including support vector machine and neural networks in regression and classification applications for strain sensor’s data analysis [ 39 , 47 ]. Random forest models are robust to outliers, nonlinear and unbalanced data, and produce low bias and moderate variance [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Random forest is an ensemble of decision trees that has shown promising results when compared with conventional machine learning algorithms including support vector machine and neural networks in regression and classification applications for strain sensor’s data analysis [ 39 , 47 ]. Random forest models are robust to outliers, nonlinear and unbalanced data, and produce low bias and moderate variance [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random forest models are robust to outliers, nonlinear and unbalanced data, and produce low bias and moderate variance [ 48 , 49 ]. We have previously used random forest to accurately estimate joint angles using strain sensors [ 39 ]. We therefore chose random forest as our method for data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensor shows similar properties as the commercially available sensors from Adafruit (New York, NY, USA) [ 19 ] and Image SI (Staten Island, NY, USA) [ 20 ], but only has a diameter of 0.4 mm, which makes it suitable to integrate into garments ( Figure 1 ). Previous work has shown good results in using machine learning to obtain accurate measurements from these textile-based stretch sensors [ 21 , 22 ] and using them for the monitoring of human movements [ 15 , 16 , 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of different IMUs, placed on connected body segments, and the additional information on the kinematic constraints (biomechanical models) enable the estimation of joint angles. As an alternative, e-textile solutions for wearable motion monitoring have been developed [25,26,27]. Textile-based solutions have the advantages of being low cost, lightweight, of low thickness, flexibility, and the possibility of adaptation to different body structures.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%