2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of insect infestation dynamics using a temporal sequence of Landsat data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
122
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
122
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have been based on defining thresholds in two-date spectral space to classify change using a variety of statistical methods based on image subtraction, image division and principal components analysis, or by defining spectral change vectors having direction and magnitude (Muchoney & Haack, 1994;Coppin et al, 2004). These methods have been extended to multiple two-date sets of imagery to classify forest changes associated with harvest , fire (Eidenshink et al, 2007), insects (Goodwin et al, 2008) and forest recovery (Hayes & Sader, 2001). Recently, interval approaches have been extended to very broad areas, a strong indication of their continued utility.…”
Section: Past Change Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have been based on defining thresholds in two-date spectral space to classify change using a variety of statistical methods based on image subtraction, image division and principal components analysis, or by defining spectral change vectors having direction and magnitude (Muchoney & Haack, 1994;Coppin et al, 2004). These methods have been extended to multiple two-date sets of imagery to classify forest changes associated with harvest , fire (Eidenshink et al, 2007), insects (Goodwin et al, 2008) and forest recovery (Hayes & Sader, 2001). Recently, interval approaches have been extended to very broad areas, a strong indication of their continued utility.…”
Section: Past Change Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the opening of Landsat data archive on the long-term data accumulation, there has been increasing interest in applying dense time series Landsat data on change detection (Wulder, Masek, Cohen, Loveland, & Woodcock, 2012;Zhu & Woodcock, 2014). Because of the advantage of high temporal frequency, many quite subtle disturbance events of forest, such as defoliation, diseases, insect pests and regeneration, can be captured based on the change of vegetation spectral attribution (Goodwin et al, 2008;Hermosilla, Wulder, White, Coops, & Hobart, 2015;Zhu, Woodcock, & Olofsson, 2012). In addition to its wide applications in forest ecosystems, such method has also been applied to quantify changes of impervious surfaces in urban environments (Powell, Cohen, Yang, Pierce, & Alberti, 2008;Schneider, 2012), coral reef health (Palandro et al, 2008) and fire events (Röder, Hill, Duguy, Alloza, & Vallejo, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many anthropogenic land cover changes occur at less than a 250-m resolution [17]. The Landsat series of instruments at a 30-m resolution provide a critical tool to understand forest changes relevant to the C-cycle from harvest [18], wildfire [19,20] and insect outbreaks [21] by extending observational studies to areas that have poor records [22]. North American studies have used the decadal epoch of Landsat data, GeoCover or the Global Land Survey (GLS) [23] to quantify forest disturbances [24,25], while others have used dense Landsat time-series stack (LTSS) data focused on specific regions to evaluate change vectors to understand forest disturbance dynamics [20,[26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the difficulty of discriminating background populations from outbreak events, few have classified insect, pest and pathogen events in Landsat data [21,36]. Widespread insect infestations have occurred in North America over the past 30+ years, which have potentially large impacts on standing C stocks [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation