2016
DOI: 10.2205/2016es000576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of in-situ horizontal stresses using the linear poroelastic model and minifrac test results in tectonically active area

Abstract: Accurate estimation of in situ stresses of a subsurface formation is important to get a basic knowledge of formation structure and position of anomalies, groundwater flows, performing fracturing operations, drilling operations, oil and/or gas production stimulation, wellbore stability analysis, and coupled geomechanics-reservoir simulation in petroleum engineering. In this paper, at first a new method for estimation of minimum and maximum horizontal stresses in tectonically active area based on the modificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The horizontal stresses can be estimated based on a poro-elastic approach (Equations ( 12) and ( 13)) [22].…”
Section: Horizontal Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The horizontal stresses can be estimated based on a poro-elastic approach (Equations ( 12) and ( 13)) [22].…”
Section: Horizontal Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above equations, S hmin and S Hmax are minimum and maximum horizontal stress magnitudes, respectively, S v is vertical stress, E is Young's modulus, ν is Poisson ratio, α is Biot coefficient, P p is pore pressure, and ε H and ε h are the maximum and minimum horizontal strain magnitudes. Appropriate values for the two horizontal strains and, hence, the two horizontal stress magnitudes, can be found by fitting these values to observational data on in situ stress magnitudes, e.g., from extended leak-off tests and minifracs [22].…”
Section: Horizontal Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the seismic prediction technology of geostress in a deep shale reservoir is immature. The magnitude and orientation of geostress are the main factors for predicting the geostress field (Hayavi and Abdideh, 2016). The geostress azimuth prediction technology based on wide-azimuth seismic data is immature, and the seismic prediction technology for geostress size has not fully considered the reservoir heterogeneity, making the prediction accuracy low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After extensive testing of rocks strata of known ratios, it was determined that the neural networks were as effective as preexisting models in determining not on the modulus ratios, but several other pertinent measurements (unconfined compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, et cetera) in known wells. This was dependent upon the operational functions utilized as inputs, however, the after the network was trained, few errors could be produced (Havavi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Neural Network Used For Geomechanics Rocks and Stresses: -mentioning
confidence: 99%