2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of higher heating value of biomass from proximate analysis: A new approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
71
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, R 2 values are calculated along with the derivation of regression models while the AAE and ABE of regression models are calculated separately with Microsoft Excel. The developed model is considered to be the best fit if the estimation errors, AAE and ABE, tended to be zero and the R 2 value was close to 1 [6,8,28]. The accuracy of the new regression models is tested by comparing the experimental results with predicted results from the new regression models.…”
Section: Evalation and Validation Of New Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, R 2 values are calculated along with the derivation of regression models while the AAE and ABE of regression models are calculated separately with Microsoft Excel. The developed model is considered to be the best fit if the estimation errors, AAE and ABE, tended to be zero and the R 2 value was close to 1 [6,8,28]. The accuracy of the new regression models is tested by comparing the experimental results with predicted results from the new regression models.…”
Section: Evalation and Validation Of New Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that a proximate-based regression model in HHV predictions of PW samples should consider FC, VM and ash content. Parikh et al [20] and Nhuchhen [8] used a similar approach and concluded that developed models with all three components of proximate analysis are required to lower estimation errors. AAE in N1 to N8 is also observed to be lower than AAE in N9 and N10 (about 3%).…”
Section: Derivation Of the New Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison is shown in Figure 5, and the models are presented in Table 6. In accordance with (Nhuchhen & Salam, 2012), the proximate analysis provides empirical information on the composition of the biomass, so some of the correlations based on proximate analysis may be low. Additionally, the evidence offered by the literature indicates that few researchers have centered their studies on particular types of biomass, preferring to focus on models of more general use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies and experimental correlations have been used to determine the HHV of biomass by proximate analysis, but the value can differ significantly among analyses (Erol et al, 2010;Chun-Yang, 2011;Vargas-Moreno et al, 2012). In some cases, a representative approximate value of the fluctuations in multiple biomasses is not available because of the varying characteristics of raw materials and even greater differences among biomasses (Erol et al, 2010;Nhuchhen & Salam, 2012). The variables evaluated in the proximate analyses have been used in multiple models to estimate the HHV of biomass and lignocellulosic materials, as reported by different authors (Chun-Yang, 2011;Vargas-Moreno et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introduction 1 2 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation