2016
DOI: 10.3126/jmrd.v2i1.16223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of heterosis in yield and yield attributing traits in single cross hybrids of maize

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted at National Maize Research Program, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal during winter season from 6th October, 2015 to 5th March 2016 to estimate different heterosis on single cross maize hybrids . Thirteen maize hybrids were tested randomized complete block design with three replications. Hybrid namely RML-98/RL-105 gave the highest standard heterosis (57.5%) for grain yield over CP-666 followed by RML-4/NML-2 (32.6%), RML-95/RL-105 (29%) and RML-5/RL-105 (20.6%). The hybrid RML-98/RL-105 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data were processed using Excel 2010 and analyzed by using Genestat software. Least significant difference (LSD p ≤ 0.05) test was used for mean comparison to identify the significant components of the treatment means (Jan et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2016;Gomez and Gomez, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data were processed using Excel 2010 and analyzed by using Genestat software. Least significant difference (LSD p ≤ 0.05) test was used for mean comparison to identify the significant components of the treatment means (Jan et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2016;Gomez and Gomez, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data were processed using Excel 2010 and analyzed by using R software. Least significant difference (LSD p ≤ 0.05) test was used for mean comparison to identify the significant components of the treatment means (Jan et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2016;Gomez & Gomez, 1984;Shrestha, 2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data were processed using Excel 2010 and analyzed by using Genstat 13.2. The treatment means were compared by the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at 5% level (Gomez & Gomez, 1984;Baral et al, 2016;Sharma et al, 2016;Shrestha, 2019;Kandel & Shrestha, 2019;Jan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%