2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
114
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
114
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter have initially focused on either persistent inefficiency (Battese & Coelli, 1988;Kumbhakar, 1987;Pitt & Lee, 1981;Schmidt & Sickles, 1984) or transient inefficiency (e.g., Battese & Coelli 1992;Cornwell et al, 1990;Kumbhakar, 1990;Lee & Schmidt, 1993). Later models have added other components to the error term: a firm effect treated as persistent inefficiency, a transient inefficiency component (Kumbhakar & Heshmati, 1995;Kumbhakar & Hjalmarsson, 1993, and an unobserved heterogeneity component together with a transient inefficiency term (Greene, 2005a(Greene, , 2005bKumbhakar & Wang, 2005;Wang & Ho 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter have initially focused on either persistent inefficiency (Battese & Coelli, 1988;Kumbhakar, 1987;Pitt & Lee, 1981;Schmidt & Sickles, 1984) or transient inefficiency (e.g., Battese & Coelli 1992;Cornwell et al, 1990;Kumbhakar, 1990;Lee & Schmidt, 1993). Later models have added other components to the error term: a firm effect treated as persistent inefficiency, a transient inefficiency component (Kumbhakar & Heshmati, 1995;Kumbhakar & Hjalmarsson, 1993, and an unobserved heterogeneity component together with a transient inefficiency term (Greene, 2005a(Greene, , 2005bKumbhakar & Wang, 2005;Wang & Ho 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are considerable variations in bank size. Moreover, the use of output growth to assert the increase of productivity faced the potential criticism that the increase of some DMU outputs were mainly from the accumulation and increase of factors and less from the technology advancement and efficiency improvement [8]. Therefore, the introduction and decomposition of CM are essential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laurenceson and Zhao (2008) found that differences in efficiency levels between the two groups were small. The inefficiency of the JECBs stemmed mainly from their failing to realize scale efficiency, while for the SOBs, pure technical inefficiency accounted for a bigger percentage (Kumbhakar and Wang, 2005;Wang and Wei, 2000). Unlike the US banks, which had a flat U-shape average cost curve, the large-and small-sized banks in China appeared to be more efficient than the medium ones.…”
Section: Efficiency Studies Of the Chinese Banking Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2005b) found that the financial deregulation of the mid-1990s improved cost efficiency levels including both technical and allocative efficiency significantly. Dividing this sample into two sub-periods, the deregulatory period (1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998), and the post-deregulatory period (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), Kumbhakar and Wang (2005) failed to find evidence to support the effectiveness of deregulation as a means to improve banks efficiency, a conclusion consistent with Fu and Heffernan (2007). Both the JECBs and SOBs experienced a decline in technical efficiency between the first (1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992) and second stages (1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002) of bank reform.…”
Section: Efficiency Studies Of the Chinese Banking Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%