Abstract:Aboveground biomass is a key indicator of a grassland ecosystem. Accurate estimation from remote sensing is important for understanding the response of grasslands to climate change and disturbance at a large scale. However, the precision of remote sensing inversion is limited by a lack in the ground truth and scale mismatch with satellite data. In this study, we first tried to establish a grassland aboveground biomass estimation model at 1 m 2 quadrat scale by conducting synchronous experiments of unmanned aer… Show more
“…The choice of parameter(s) derived from UAS imagery is likely the most important factor influencing the accuracy and predictive ability of AGB estimation. Some studies used spectral information [2,11,18,24,26,43,58,[60][61][62] and some structural information [1,8,22,23,28,34,48,50,55,[63][64][65]. Others used both [3][4][5][6]9,12,16,20,21,25,30,33,49,57,[66][67][68], while a few studies used spectral and structural metrics plus another data type [13,27,69] (Table A1).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean height [3,9,12,13,15,16,[19][20][21]23,25,28,30,34,[48][49][50]57,58,63,65,[67][68][69][74][75][76] Maximum height [1,3,4,13,28,30,34,48,57,63,65,69] Minimum height [3,28,34,48,57,63,65,69] Median height [12,21,27,48,63,65,…”
Section: Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grüner et al [19] found that, when grouped, grass species showed a good relationship between mean canopy height and ground-level AGB measurements (R 2 = 0.73) but that individual species models had variable accuracy (R 2 = 0.62-0.81). Zhang et al [65] found that a logarithmic regression using mean height had an excellent relationship with grasslands biomass (R 2 = 0.80).…”
Interest in the use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to estimate the aboveground biomass (AGB) of vegetation in agricultural and non-agricultural settings is growing rapidly but there is no standardized methodology for planning, collecting and analyzing UAS data for this purpose. We synthesized 46 studies from the peer-reviewed literature to provide the first-ever review on the subject. Our analysis showed that spectral and structural data from UAS imagery can accurately estimate vegetation biomass in a variety of settings, especially when both data types are combined. Vegetation-height metrics are useful for trees, while metrics of variation in structure or volume are better for non-woody vegetation. Multispectral indices using NIR and red-edge wavelengths normally have strong relationships with AGB but RGB-based indices often outperform them in models. Including measures of image texture can improve model accuracy for vegetation with heterogeneous canopies. Vegetation growth structure and phenological stage strongly influence model accuracy and the selection of useful metrics and should be considered carefully. Additional factors related to the study environment, data collection and analytical approach also impact biomass estimation and need to be considered throughout the workflow. Our review shows that UASs provide a capable tool for fine-scale, spatially explicit estimations of vegetation AGB and are an ideal complement to existing ground- and satellite-based approaches. We recommend future studies aimed at emerging UAS technologies and at evaluating the effect of vegetation type and growth stages on AGB estimation.
“…The choice of parameter(s) derived from UAS imagery is likely the most important factor influencing the accuracy and predictive ability of AGB estimation. Some studies used spectral information [2,11,18,24,26,43,58,[60][61][62] and some structural information [1,8,22,23,28,34,48,50,55,[63][64][65]. Others used both [3][4][5][6]9,12,16,20,21,25,30,33,49,57,[66][67][68], while a few studies used spectral and structural metrics plus another data type [13,27,69] (Table A1).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean height [3,9,12,13,15,16,[19][20][21]23,25,28,30,34,[48][49][50]57,58,63,65,[67][68][69][74][75][76] Maximum height [1,3,4,13,28,30,34,48,57,63,65,69] Minimum height [3,28,34,48,57,63,65,69] Median height [12,21,27,48,63,65,…”
Section: Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grüner et al [19] found that, when grouped, grass species showed a good relationship between mean canopy height and ground-level AGB measurements (R 2 = 0.73) but that individual species models had variable accuracy (R 2 = 0.62-0.81). Zhang et al [65] found that a logarithmic regression using mean height had an excellent relationship with grasslands biomass (R 2 = 0.80).…”
Interest in the use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to estimate the aboveground biomass (AGB) of vegetation in agricultural and non-agricultural settings is growing rapidly but there is no standardized methodology for planning, collecting and analyzing UAS data for this purpose. We synthesized 46 studies from the peer-reviewed literature to provide the first-ever review on the subject. Our analysis showed that spectral and structural data from UAS imagery can accurately estimate vegetation biomass in a variety of settings, especially when both data types are combined. Vegetation-height metrics are useful for trees, while metrics of variation in structure or volume are better for non-woody vegetation. Multispectral indices using NIR and red-edge wavelengths normally have strong relationships with AGB but RGB-based indices often outperform them in models. Including measures of image texture can improve model accuracy for vegetation with heterogeneous canopies. Vegetation growth structure and phenological stage strongly influence model accuracy and the selection of useful metrics and should be considered carefully. Additional factors related to the study environment, data collection and analytical approach also impact biomass estimation and need to be considered throughout the workflow. Our review shows that UASs provide a capable tool for fine-scale, spatially explicit estimations of vegetation AGB and are an ideal complement to existing ground- and satellite-based approaches. We recommend future studies aimed at emerging UAS technologies and at evaluating the effect of vegetation type and growth stages on AGB estimation.
“…As one of the most important indicators to describe the growing status of the crop, plant height (PH) has been widely used to estimate AGB [26,27]. Zhang et al [28] estimated AGB of grassland by using PH at three different study sites selected from the Gansu, Inner Mongolia, and Jiangsu provinces of China, and indicated a high correlation between the PH and AGB with the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values greater than 0.66. In addition to PH, vegetation indices (VIs) which could provide reliable information about crop growing status [26,29,30], such as green canopy cover and PH, have also been investigated as a reliable source to estimate AGB [31][32][33].…”
The rapid, accurate, and economical estimation of crop above-ground biomass at the farm scale is crucial for precision agricultural management. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote-sensing system has a great application potential with the ability to obtain remote-sensing imagery with high temporal-spatial resolution. To verify the application potential of consumer-grade UAV RGB imagery in estimating maize above-ground biomass, vegetation indices and plant height derived from UAV RGB imagery were adopted. To obtain a more accurate observation, plant height was directly derived from UAV RGB point clouds. To search the optimal estimation method, the estimation performances of the models based on vegetation indices alone, based on plant height alone, and based on both vegetation indices and plant height were compared. The results showed that plant height directly derived from UAV RGB point clouds had a high correlation with ground-truth data with an R2 value of 0.90 and an RMSE value of 0.12 m. The above-ground biomass exponential regression models based on plant height alone had higher correlations for both fresh and dry above-ground biomass with R2 values of 0.77 and 0.76, respectively, compared to the linear regression model (both R2 values were 0.59). The vegetation indices derived from UAV RGB imagery had great potential to estimate maize above-ground biomass with R2 values ranging from 0.63 to 0.73. When estimating the above-ground biomass of maize by using multivariable linear regression based on vegetation indices, a higher correlation was obtained with an R2 value of 0.82. There was no significant improvement of the estimation performance when plant height derived from UAV RGB imagery was added into the multivariable linear regression model based on vegetation indices. When estimating crop above-ground biomass based on UAV RGB remote-sensing system alone, looking for optimized vegetation indices and establishing estimation models with high performance based on advanced algorithms (e.g., machine learning technology) may be a better way.
“…SfM is a computer vision technology that generates 3D geometry by repetitive bundle adjustment of the multiple unordered overlapped images and image matching techniques, like the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [14,15]. Crop surface models (CSMs) derived from 3D point clouds contain crop canopy vertical distribution information, which can be used for crop monitoring, e.g., plant height measurement [16], biomass estimation [17][18][19][20], and yield prediction [21]. In addition to CSMs, RGB images, and multi-and hyper-spectral images acquired for UAV were combined with CSMs to estimate biomass [22][23][24][25][26][27].Although CSMs derived from 3D point clouds were used in the research mentioned above, they focused mostly only on the plant heights derived from gridded CSMs.…”
Accurate estimation of above ground biomass (AGB) is very important for crop growth monitoring. The objective of this study was to estimate rice biomass by utilizing structural and meteorological features with widely used spectral features. Structural features were derived from the triangulated irregular network (TIN), which was directly built from structure from motion (SfM) point clouds. Growing degree days (GDD) was used as the meteorological feature. Three models were used to estimate rice AGB, including the simple linear regression (SLR) model, simple exponential regression (SER) model, and machine learning model (random forest). Compared to models that do not use structural and meteorological features (NDRE, R2 = 0.64, RMSE = 286.79 g/m2, MAE = 236.49 g/m2), models that include such features obtained better estimation accuracy (NDRE*Hcv/GDD, R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 178.37 g/m2, MAE = 127.34 g/m2). This study suggests that the estimation accuracy of rice biomass can benefit from the utilization of structural and meteorological features.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.