2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10060851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Grassland Canopy Height and Aboveground Biomass at the Quadrat Scale Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Abstract: Aboveground biomass is a key indicator of a grassland ecosystem. Accurate estimation from remote sensing is important for understanding the response of grasslands to climate change and disturbance at a large scale. However, the precision of remote sensing inversion is limited by a lack in the ground truth and scale mismatch with satellite data. In this study, we first tried to establish a grassland aboveground biomass estimation model at 1 m 2 quadrat scale by conducting synchronous experiments of unmanned aer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(86 reference statements)
5
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of parameter(s) derived from UAS imagery is likely the most important factor influencing the accuracy and predictive ability of AGB estimation. Some studies used spectral information [2,11,18,24,26,43,58,[60][61][62] and some structural information [1,8,22,23,28,34,48,50,55,[63][64][65]. Others used both [3][4][5][6]9,12,16,20,21,25,30,33,49,57,[66][67][68], while a few studies used spectral and structural metrics plus another data type [13,27,69] (Table A1).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The choice of parameter(s) derived from UAS imagery is likely the most important factor influencing the accuracy and predictive ability of AGB estimation. Some studies used spectral information [2,11,18,24,26,43,58,[60][61][62] and some structural information [1,8,22,23,28,34,48,50,55,[63][64][65]. Others used both [3][4][5][6]9,12,16,20,21,25,30,33,49,57,[66][67][68], while a few studies used spectral and structural metrics plus another data type [13,27,69] (Table A1).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean height [3,9,12,13,15,16,[19][20][21]23,25,28,30,34,[48][49][50]57,58,63,65,[67][68][69][74][75][76] Maximum height [1,3,4,13,28,30,34,48,57,63,65,69] Minimum height [3,28,34,48,57,63,65,69] Median height [12,21,27,48,63,65,…”
Section: Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one of the most important indicators to describe the growing status of the crop, plant height (PH) has been widely used to estimate AGB [26,27]. Zhang et al [28] estimated AGB of grassland by using PH at three different study sites selected from the Gansu, Inner Mongolia, and Jiangsu provinces of China, and indicated a high correlation between the PH and AGB with the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values greater than 0.66. In addition to PH, vegetation indices (VIs) which could provide reliable information about crop growing status [26,29,30], such as green canopy cover and PH, have also been investigated as a reliable source to estimate AGB [31][32][33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SfM is a computer vision technology that generates 3D geometry by repetitive bundle adjustment of the multiple unordered overlapped images and image matching techniques, like the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [14,15]. Crop surface models (CSMs) derived from 3D point clouds contain crop canopy vertical distribution information, which can be used for crop monitoring, e.g., plant height measurement [16], biomass estimation [17][18][19][20], and yield prediction [21]. In addition to CSMs, RGB images, and multi-and hyper-spectral images acquired for UAV were combined with CSMs to estimate biomass [22][23][24][25][26][27].Although CSMs derived from 3D point clouds were used in the research mentioned above, they focused mostly only on the plant heights derived from gridded CSMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%