2017
DOI: 10.21921/jas.v4i2.7782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path analysis in short duration Rice Genotypes of Manipur

Abstract: An Open Access International Peer Reviewed Quarterly High significant variations were observed for all the traits studied under present investigation. Considering parameters, high phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) were observed for the number of effective tillers per plant, grain yield per plant, plant height followed by days to 50% flowering. Heritability in broad sense was higher in all of the characters studied under present investigation. High heritabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
12
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation among traits under study indicated that the short period to heading will provide more time to increase the number of panicle per plant and 1000 grain weight, and full-grain number per panicle will be improved by increasing of panicle length or panicle number per plant, as well as any increase in panicle number per plant will cause an increase in 1000 grain weight which leads to improvement of the final grain yield which was correlated positively to yield traits. These results agree with the results of Kumar et al (2011), Khush (2013), Karim et al (2014), Kumar et al (2017), Lakshmi et al (2017), Bhutta et al (2019), Chhangte and Devi, (2019), and Panda et al (2019). Current knowledge about trait relationships helps in the appropriate selection process due to the increased share of crop improvement (Gonçalves et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The correlation among traits under study indicated that the short period to heading will provide more time to increase the number of panicle per plant and 1000 grain weight, and full-grain number per panicle will be improved by increasing of panicle length or panicle number per plant, as well as any increase in panicle number per plant will cause an increase in 1000 grain weight which leads to improvement of the final grain yield which was correlated positively to yield traits. These results agree with the results of Kumar et al (2011), Khush (2013), Karim et al (2014), Kumar et al (2017), Lakshmi et al (2017), Bhutta et al (2019), Chhangte and Devi, (2019), and Panda et al (2019). Current knowledge about trait relationships helps in the appropriate selection process due to the increased share of crop improvement (Gonçalves et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Pollen fertility had significant positive correlation with yield per plant because higher percentage of fertile pollen led to higher seed set and ultimately increased yield. Number of grains per panicle and number of filled grains per panicle had significant positive correlation with yield per plant and these results are in consistent with the findings of Kumar et al (2017). Significant positive correlation of number of grains per panicle with number of filled grains per panicle was also recorded by Vanisree et al (2013).…”
Section: Estimation Of Correlation Co-efficient Among the Traitssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This character influenced grain yield per plant by its highest indirect positive effects. The same result was recently reported by Kumar et al (2017). But Sarwar et al (2015) and Hairmansis et al (2011) found positive direct effect of filled grains per panicle on yield per plant.…”
Section: Estimation Of Path Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A positive correlation between desirable characters is favourable because it helps in simultaneous improvement of both the characters. Similar results were previously confirmed by Ketan and Sarkar (2014), Sohgaura et al, (2014), Dongre et al, (2014), Shrivastava et al, (2015), Yadav et al, (2015), Sameera et al, (2016), Vinoth et al, (2016), Kumar et al, (2017), Onyia et al, (2017), Shamim et al, (2017)and Pratap et al, (2018).…”
Section: Correlation Coefficient Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%