1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00203-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of genetic parameters from pedigreed populations: lessons from analysis of alevin weight in Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in Martinez et al [12] and Gjerdea et al [13], the ratios of the full-sib effect to phenotypic variance were 0.07-0.17 and 0.03-0.12 on alevin weight in Oncorhynchus keta and Gadus morhua, respectively. Early growth and development are vulnerable to the impact of maternal genetic effect in fish [5,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…As reported in Martinez et al [12] and Gjerdea et al [13], the ratios of the full-sib effect to phenotypic variance were 0.07-0.17 and 0.03-0.12 on alevin weight in Oncorhynchus keta and Gadus morhua, respectively. Early growth and development are vulnerable to the impact of maternal genetic effect in fish [5,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…(Patterson and Thompson, 1971) using animal models and BLUP analysis is made by simultaneously fitting the random effects in the linear model, assuming specified (co)variance matrices. Obtaining correct REML estimators is based on the assumption that sufficient information is known about the specified random effects and that the correct model is used for estimation and prediction purposes (Martínez et al, 1999).…”
Section: Breeding Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative maternal-animal genetic correlation might be more common in egg-laying species without adult care because total energetic investment is determined prior to oviposition without much ecological recourse to post-hatch investment. However, trends are not readily apparent for the latter group from the limited literature to date (see Koerhuis and Thompson 1997;Martínez et al 1999;Hartmann et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%