2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00404-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of gender-specific connectional brain templates using joint multi-view cortical morphological network integration

Abstract: The estimation of a connectional brain template (CBT) integrating a population of brain networks while capturing shared and differential connectional patterns across individuals remains unexplored in gender fingerprinting. This paper presents the first study to estimate gender-specific CBTs using multi-view cortical morphological networks (CMNs) estimated from conventional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Specifically, each CMN view is derived from a specific cortical attribute (e.g. thickness), e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We present the first review paper which provides an insightful survey of the existing integration models promoted with a comparative study to evaluate their performance across extensive experiments in terms of producing the most centered templates, recapitulating unique traits of populations, and , similarity network fusion (SNF) (Wang et al, 2014) and supervised multi-topology network cross-diffusion (SM-netFusion) ; and b) multi-graph integration methods for a population of multi-view brain connectivity dataset: multi-view networks normalizer (netNorm) (Dhifallah et al, 2020), cluster-based network fusion (SCA) (Dhifallah et al, 2019), multiview clustering and fusion (MVCF-Net) (Chaari et al, 2020) and cluster-based multi-graph integrator networks (cMGI-Net) (Gurbuz and Rekik, 2020).…”
Section: Comparative Brain Multigraph Integration and Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We present the first review paper which provides an insightful survey of the existing integration models promoted with a comparative study to evaluate their performance across extensive experiments in terms of producing the most centered templates, recapitulating unique traits of populations, and , similarity network fusion (SNF) (Wang et al, 2014) and supervised multi-topology network cross-diffusion (SM-netFusion) ; and b) multi-graph integration methods for a population of multi-view brain connectivity dataset: multi-view networks normalizer (netNorm) (Dhifallah et al, 2020), cluster-based network fusion (SCA) (Dhifallah et al, 2019), multiview clustering and fusion (MVCF-Net) (Chaari et al, 2020) and cluster-based multi-graph integrator networks (cMGI-Net) (Gurbuz and Rekik, 2020).…”
Section: Comparative Brain Multigraph Integration and Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group represents multi-view graphs integration methods that fuse populations of multi-view networks into a single connectional template. For this category, we review five multigraph fusion methods: netNorm (Dhi-fallah et al, 2020), SCA (Dhifallah et al, 2019), MVCF-Net (Chaari et al, 2020), cMGI-Net (Demir et al, 2020), and DGN (Gurbuz and Rekik, 2020). Multigraph fusion methods can be sub-categorized into two big classes: machine learning-based and deep learning-based models.…”
Section: Comparative Brain Multigraph Integration and Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations