World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007 2007
DOI: 10.1061/40927(243)407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Flow-Duration Curves at Ungaged Sites in Southern New England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern does not indicate a clearly preferred distribution, especially considering that the large sample sizes associated with these series result in negligible sampling variability. Archfield et al (2007, Figure 3) used L-moment diagrams for complete series of daily streamflow observations to demonstrate that the sampling variability in Lmoment ratios is negligible for the sample sizes considered in this study. Thus, the scatter shown in Figure 1 is likely due to real distributional differences rather than due to sampling variability as is often the case when one constructs L-moment diagrams for short AMS rainfall records.…”
Section: Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Goodness-of-fit Evamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern does not indicate a clearly preferred distribution, especially considering that the large sample sizes associated with these series result in negligible sampling variability. Archfield et al (2007, Figure 3) used L-moment diagrams for complete series of daily streamflow observations to demonstrate that the sampling variability in Lmoment ratios is negligible for the sample sizes considered in this study. Thus, the scatter shown in Figure 1 is likely due to real distributional differences rather than due to sampling variability as is often the case when one constructs L-moment diagrams for short AMS rainfall records.…”
Section: Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Goodness-of-fit Evamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Vogel and Fennessey [1995] note that daily streamflows originate from highly skewed populations, and sample estimates of distribution parameters may contain large bias even for sites with very long records. A number of different statistical functions have been used to model daily flow distributions, including the lognormal, exponential, γ , and pareto [ Fennessey and Vogel , 1990; Vogel and Fennessey , 1993; Nash , 1994; Potter , 2001; Vogel et al , 2003; Castellarin et al , 2004; Goodwin , 2004; Doyle et al , 2005; Mueller and Pitlick , 2005; Archfield et al , 2007; Doyle and Shields , 2008]. The procedure for fitting these distributions is straightforward, and any one of them might offer a reasonably good fit to a series of observations.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Distribution Of Daily Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many continuous probability distribution functions have been used to represent daily stream flow, which are generally highly positively skewed, including the two‐parameter lognormal, gamma, Generalized Pareto, exponential, as well as broken power law functions [e.g., Vogel et al ., ; Goodwin , ; Archfield et al ., ; Quader and Guo ; Segura and Pitlick , ]. In general, continuous PDFs fit natural flow records with mixed results, especially in the right tail of the distribution and in multimodal cases [ Nash , ; Segura and Pitlick , ].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%