2019
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1678144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of fetal radiation absorbed dose during the prophylactic use of aortic occlusion balloon for abnormally invasive placenta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aortic balloon deflation and subsequent reperfusion can lead to potential cardiovascular complications 29 . The radiation dose can be decreased with aortic occlusion but with an associated risk of severe complications 32 . Placement of the occlusion balloons in the common iliac arteries can be performed even without X-ray exposure under ultrasound guidance, but with a higher risk of thromboembolic complications and risks of retrograde flow into the internal iliac arteries 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic balloon deflation and subsequent reperfusion can lead to potential cardiovascular complications 29 . The radiation dose can be decreased with aortic occlusion but with an associated risk of severe complications 32 . Placement of the occlusion balloons in the common iliac arteries can be performed even without X-ray exposure under ultrasound guidance, but with a higher risk of thromboembolic complications and risks of retrograde flow into the internal iliac arteries 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fetal radiation dose with temporary aortic balloon occlusion varies among studies. Duan et al reported a fetal radiation dose of 4.2±2.9 (SD) mGy (40) but Nieto-Calvache reported entrance skin dose and radiation absorbed dose by the fetus of 1.31±0.96 (SD) mGy and 0.27±0.28 (SD) mGy, respectively in 10 women with AIP using C-arm (119).…”
Section: Prophylactic Balloon Occlusion Of the Abdominal Aortamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent meta-analyses demonstrated that aortic balloon occlusion reduced intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements and the need for caesarean hysterectomy in PAS with low procedure-related complication rates, ranging from 1.7% to 2.2% [ 6 , 7 ]. Widespread adoption of this technique has been limited by the need for access to interventional radiology expertise, equipment and angiography suites, along with ionizing radiation exposure to staff, patient and fetus [ 13 ]. Here, a safe and practical technique is presented using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for aortic balloon insertion to facilitate uterine conservation in a case of severe PAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%