2003
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/76.3.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fertility variation was relatively low throughout the fiveyear period (Table 2), compared to the review by KANG et al (2003). Clone fertility and fertility variation are likely to change over time even if none of the clones are replaced or removed.…”
Section: Fertility Variationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fertility variation was relatively low throughout the fiveyear period (Table 2), compared to the review by KANG et al (2003). Clone fertility and fertility variation are likely to change over time even if none of the clones are replaced or removed.…”
Section: Fertility Variationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…High fertility variation has also been reported in a pedigreed E. tereticornis seedling seed orchard in Tamil nadu . KANG et al (2003) reported an average Ψ value of 2.62 for seed orchards of broadleaved species. Generally sibling coefficient values may be high in young orchards and during poor flowering years .…”
Section: Fertility In Eucalypt Orchards and Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review suggests Ψ (Ss) = 2 may be used for seed orchard clones as a heuristic rule (KANG et al, 2003). NIKKANEN and RUOTSALAINEN (2000) found 1/0.59 = Ψ (Ss) = 1.8 for a Norway spruce seed orchard.…”
Section: Sibling Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%