2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of farmers’ willingness to pay for water in the agricultural sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative signs of both variables indicate that their increase reduces farmer WTP. These result show that the social characteristics do not affect the value of farmer WTP, 12 The similar result identified by [24] who found that, when faced with water scarcity, farmers employ irrigation system with high efficiency to reduce the use and cost of water and change cropping pattern to cultivate crops with low water requirements. the identical result has also been identified by [15] who identified the determinants of WTP for groundwater in Iran.…”
Section: Determinants Of Willingness To Paysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The negative signs of both variables indicate that their increase reduces farmer WTP. These result show that the social characteristics do not affect the value of farmer WTP, 12 The similar result identified by [24] who found that, when faced with water scarcity, farmers employ irrigation system with high efficiency to reduce the use and cost of water and change cropping pattern to cultivate crops with low water requirements. the identical result has also been identified by [15] who identified the determinants of WTP for groundwater in Iran.…”
Section: Determinants Of Willingness To Paysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The problem is compounded by the fact that instances of lower than average water supply often coincide with higher than average need for irrigation. A wide range of mathematical programming techniques have been applied, individually and in combination, to support irrigation planning including multistage stochastic programming (28% of articles on irrigation in the sample including [34,54,173]), stochastic dynamic programming (25% of articles on irrigation in the sample including [12,22,158]), inexact programming, including fuzzy and interval-based programming, (36% of articles on irrigation in the sample, for example [35,105,152]) and nonlinear programming (14% of articles on irrigation in the sample including [10,25]). The problem has been studied at various levels ranging from the farm level [22,83,92] to the level of a large water system or country [107,144,221].…”
Section: Agricultural Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bozorg-Haddad et al (2016) estimated farmer's response to the price of agricultural water. No effect on water use was found under low prices compared to non-priced water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%