2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Errors Associated With Use of Linear-Quadratic Formalism for Evaluation of Biologic Equivalence Between Single and Hypofractionated Radiation Doses: An In Vitro Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Gamma Knife SRS, the dose delivered to the optic pathways is usually limited to 8 -10 Gy, whereas we were able to safely administer 21 Gy in 3 fractions or 25 Gy in 5 fractions in most cases. Although linear quadratic formalism is not applicable to these fractionation schedules, 24,25 21 Gy in 3 fractions corresponds to 13.1 Gy in 1 fraction, assuming an a/b ratio of 3 Gy, and 25 Gy in 5 fractions corresponds to 12.7 Gy. The actual efficacy of hypofractionation is considered to be about 15% higher.…”
Section: Survival and Local Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Gamma Knife SRS, the dose delivered to the optic pathways is usually limited to 8 -10 Gy, whereas we were able to safely administer 21 Gy in 3 fractions or 25 Gy in 5 fractions in most cases. Although linear quadratic formalism is not applicable to these fractionation schedules, 24,25 21 Gy in 3 fractions corresponds to 13.1 Gy in 1 fraction, assuming an a/b ratio of 3 Gy, and 25 Gy in 5 fractions corresponds to 12.7 Gy. The actual efficacy of hypofractionation is considered to be about 15% higher.…”
Section: Survival and Local Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual efficacy of hypofractionation is considered to be about 15% higher. 24 Therefore, it could be said that 21 Gy in 3 fractions corresponds to 15.1 Gy in 1 fraction, and 25 Gy in 5 fractions corresponds to 14.6 Gy. In vivo, a higher effect of fractionation is expected, especially when reoxygenation of hypoxic cells takes place, 26,27 but this is probably not the case for benign tumors such as PA. At any rate, the biological effects of our fractionation schedules on tumors appear to be stronger than those of the 8-10 Gy dose used in Gamma Knife treatment, which may account for the favorable tumor control rate observed in our study.…”
Section: Survival and Local Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BED 10 was 51.3 Gy for the 27 Gy/3 fr schedule and 56 Gy for the 40 Gy/10 fr schedule. Although the BED must be cautiously used in these dose-fractionation ranges [28,29], it was recommended that an appropriate BED 10 range was 42 to 56 Gy. Therefore, we started with a prescription dose of 28 Gy delivered in 4 fractions, with a BED of 47.6 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on one side, and by the use of "hybrid shots" with the new "Perfexion" whenever dealing with crucial targeting (7,36,50,57,58,66). 2. the introduction of dedicated algorhitms accurately "driving" the dose planning system, with probabilistic models including stockastic monitoring, quadrature-sum analysis (20) and linear-quadratic formalisms (32). These techniques, and the concomitant diffusion of phantom studies, have repeatedly confirmed the reliability of such referrals, consistently improving the main conformity indexes.…”
Section: Gamma Knife Radiosurgerymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…dose volume integral, conformity index etc. (6,20,22,56,72,83,86) However, recent reports have emphasized the extremely high chances to maintain adequate LTC rates -without increasing side effects-by treating larger meningiomas with either fractionated schedules or reduced dosages (3,13,18,19,22,24,31,32). b. the controversial or disappointing results obtained in atypic and anaplastic lesions (17,25,27,30,51,73), sometimes characterized by intra-or extraneuraxis metastatization (17) or by enhanced growth after radiosurgery (6,14,42); c. the still pronounced morbidity rate of this technique on sensory nerves (6,14,77).…”
Section: Anaplastic (Gr 3) Meningiomamentioning
confidence: 99%