2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of ergodic agent-based models by simulated minimum distance

Abstract: Two difficulties arise in the estimation of AB models: (i) the criterion function has no simple analytical expression, (ii) the aggregate properties of the model cannot be analytically understood. In this paper we show how to circumvent these difficulties and under which conditions ergodic models can be consistently estimated by simulated minimum distance techniques, both in a long-run equilibrium and during an adjustment phase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Agent Based Models (ABMs) have often been advocated as promising alternatives to neoclassical models rooted in the dogmatic paradigms of rational expectations and representative agents, there are still some concerns about how to bring them down to the data (Windrum et al, 2007;Gallegati and Richiardi, 2009;Grazzini and Richiardi, 2015). In macroeconomics, for example, Giannone et al (2006), Canova and Sala (2009) and Paccagnini (2009) provide details about how to estimate and validate Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though Agent Based Models (ABMs) have often been advocated as promising alternatives to neoclassical models rooted in the dogmatic paradigms of rational expectations and representative agents, there are still some concerns about how to bring them down to the data (Windrum et al, 2007;Gallegati and Richiardi, 2009;Grazzini and Richiardi, 2015). In macroeconomics, for example, Giannone et al (2006), Canova and Sala (2009) and Paccagnini (2009) provide details about how to estimate and validate Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the same procedure, Gilli and Winker (2003) and Winker et al (2007) introduced an algorithm and a set of statistics leading to the construction of an objective function used to estimate models of exchange rate and to push them closer to the properties of real data. 1 Recently, Grazzini and Richiardi (2015) proposed the approach of simulated minimum distance for estimation of ergodic ABMs, both in the long run equilibrium and during transitional dynamics, while Recchioni et al (2015) used a simple gradient-based calibration procedure to conveniently sample the parameter space minimizing a standard loss function based on the cumulative squared errors. The key choice of a calibration exercise seems to boil down to the function that measures models' fit 1 On the use of indirect inference see also Fabretti (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our viewpoint of empirically determining all measurable parameters and calibrating the model by choosing the non-measurable behavioural parameters, completed by a thorough sensitivity analysis, is certainly not the only option. It is advocated by Cirillo and Gallegati (2012) but criticized by Grazzini and Richiardi (2015), who argue in favour of estimating all parameters through simulation. Yet another viewpoint is that of estimating the parameters in a Bayesian way, making use of all available qualitative and quantitative information to go from distributions of input values and arrive at distributions of output values (Poole and Raftery 2000;Bijak et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, recent developments in agent-based macro-economics have led to the development of more and more complex models, which require large sets of parameters to adequately capture the complexity of micro-founded, multi-sector and possibly multi-country phenomena 6 See also Grazzini and Richiardi (2015) and Fabretti (2012) for other applications of the same approach (see Fagiolo and Roventini, 2017, for a recent survey). In such a setting, neither direct estimations nor global sensitivity analysis (often advocated as a natural approach to ABM exploration, cf.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of Agent-based Models: The Case Fmentioning
confidence: 99%