2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-017-2179-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of empirically fitted parameters for calculating pK a values of thiols in a fast and reliable way

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pK a values for species A , F and radical HOO • are experimentally measured. For the rest of the species, the pK a values were calculated as proposed in reference , using the fitted parameters m = 0.356 and C 0 = − 94.378.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The pK a values for species A , F and radical HOO • are experimentally measured. For the rest of the species, the pK a values were calculated as proposed in reference , using the fitted parameters m = 0.356 and C 0 = − 94.378.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the previous case, SET reactions with species A, D, F and L are endergonic. However if the working pH is taken into account, the HOO − anion will be immediately protonated (pK a = 11.6), and the calculated free energies must be corrected by a factor of 5.73 kcal/mol. That is because the corresponding Gibbs energy of reaction would explicitly depend on the pH. Thus, this effect has been considered here, and the reported data correspond to pH = 7.4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this equation Δ G BA represents the difference in Gibbs energy between the conjugated base and the corresponding acid ( G calc(A–) – G calc(HA) ). The m and C 0 parameters are currently available, at several levels of theory for phenols, amines, carboxylic acids and thiols . In all cases the calculated p K a values result in deviations from experiments that are lower than 0.5 p K a units, in terms of mean unsigned errors.…”
Section: The Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%