2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of effective parameters for microperforated panel absorbers and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3e , which increases the overall porosity of the MSP/MSDEBA panel. As the open ratio ( V ) is increased, like any MPP or combination of MPPs 66 68 , it reduces the acoustic reactance of the system following Eqs. 5 and 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3e , which increases the overall porosity of the MSP/MSDEBA panel. As the open ratio ( V ) is increased, like any MPP or combination of MPPs 66 68 , it reduces the acoustic reactance of the system following Eqs. 5 and 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-load-method-based impedance tube with an inner diameter of 34.8 mm and a frequency range of 500–3000 Hz was utilised to measure transmission loss. 47 In Figure 4, four flush-mounted pressure microphones (GRAS 46AD) were used to measure the sound pressure inside the tube. LMS SCADAS system and LMS Test Lab software were utilised for signal acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 2b, continuous red line) [29]. The calculations were made with (4) and ( 5), where the effective surface impedance Z eff of MPP (index 1) plus air cavity (index 0) in Figure 2a is represented by the scattering matrix T eff .…”
Section: Modeling and Parameter Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%