2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-018-1002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of dynamic friction and movement history of large landslides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, comparing the full force history inverted from seismic data to the catalog of forces calculated with our model may provide a way to determine the iceberg characteristics (ice mass loss) from the seismic signal as done for landslides. Indeed, for landslides, combining seismic inversion and numerical modeling makes it possible to determine the characteristics of the released mass and the friction coefficient and to quantify physical processes acting during the flow (e.g., erosion; Moretti et al, ; Moretti et al, ; Yamada, Mangeney, Matsushi & Moretti, ; Yamada, Mangeney, Matsushi & Matsuzawai, ). To reduce the number of possible ( ε , H ) combinations, one could possibly often assume that the iceberg heights are close to the glacier thickness in the margin of the calving front.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, comparing the full force history inverted from seismic data to the catalog of forces calculated with our model may provide a way to determine the iceberg characteristics (ice mass loss) from the seismic signal as done for landslides. Indeed, for landslides, combining seismic inversion and numerical modeling makes it possible to determine the characteristics of the released mass and the friction coefficient and to quantify physical processes acting during the flow (e.g., erosion; Moretti et al, ; Moretti et al, ; Yamada, Mangeney, Matsushi & Moretti, ; Yamada, Mangeney, Matsushi & Matsuzawai, ). To reduce the number of possible ( ε , H ) combinations, one could possibly often assume that the iceberg heights are close to the glacier thickness in the margin of the calving front.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic source characteristics (amplitude, duration and evolution with time) are related to the dynamic processes that are involved. They should depend on rheological and dimensional parameters as has been shown for landslide events (Ekström & Stark, 2013;Favreau et al, 2010;Moretti et al, 2012;Moretti et al, 2015;Yamada, Mangeney, Matsushi & Moretti, 2018;Yamada, Mangeney, Matsushi & Matsuzawai, 2018;Zhao et al, 2014). Detailed comparison of the force history inverted from seismic data with the force calculated by landslide models provides a unique way to determine the characteristics and dynamics of natural landslides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different large landslides that occurred in Japan and the ones reported by Ekström and Stark (), Yamada et al () found a scaling law maxfalse(VXCOMfalse)2false(normalΔHCOMfalse)0.5, relating maxfalse(VXCOMfalse), the maximum speed of the center of mass in the X ‐direction and Δ H COM , the height difference of the center of mass before and after the collapse. We observe a similar scaling law in our experiments for d =2 mm and different masses M and aspect ratios a , with a power about 0.53 when we fit all of our data for all slope angles θ (Figure c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, for a given slope angle , the maximum bulk speed seems to increase as max(V COM X ) ≈ 2(ΔH COM ) 1.2 . Therefore, the relation reported by Yamada et al (2018) may be due to the fact that the different landslides occurred at different slope angles . This illustrates an advantage of the laboratory experiments of granular flows such as the ones conducted in the present study: we can separate the different controlling parameters and better understand the link between different flow characteristics.…”
Section: Scaling Laws Between Flow Dynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Simulations of elliptic landslides by Martel (2004) show that the most compressive and the most tensile stresses are parallel to the major axis of the landslide, coinciding with the average landslide aspect. Yamada et al (2013) and Yamada et al (2018) show for several japanese landslides that peak forces were aligned parallel to the long side of the landslides; Allstadt (2013) shows from waveform inversion for the Mt. Meager landslide that force and acceleration were parallel to the longer side of the landslide source area.…”
Section: Topographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%